Geomorphometric analysis of landform pattern using topographic position and aster GDEM
- Publication Type:
- Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 2019, 9 pp. 1139 - 1160
- Issue Date:
|Lay2019_Chapter_GeomorphometricAnalysisOfLandf.pdf||Published version||1.13 MB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019. A number of research have been carried out on geomorphology using a conventional approach to classify the landform; this has a tendency of producing misleading result, due to ruggedness and inaccessibility of the terrain. Geographic Information System (GIS) and remote sensing techniques are capable of generating automated landform classes using Topographic Position Index techniques (TPI). This research is set to achieve the following objectives: to categorize landform elements and to illustrate the complexity of the terrain in Negeri Sembilan state based on ASTER GDEM with 30 m resolution. TPI-based algorithm for landscape classification was applied to slope position and landform classification automation. We used 300 and 3000 neighbourhood size on the TPI grids to determine the landform categories. To quantify the spatial pattern of topographic position, Deviation from mean elevation (DEV) is adopted. Maximum Elevation Deviation was selected to measure the spatial landscape pattern at the maximum (3000) scale of the absolute DEV value within the scale (DEV max ), and finally, high-pass filter algorithm was used to identify the extreme topography (ridges/valleys). The combination of the TPI and slope position of DEV that formed the landform classification results show four prominent landform classes these include canyons, U-shape valley, local ridges/ hill valleys, and mountaintops/high ridges. The slope position classes revealed only two (valley/cliff base and ridges/canyons edge) classes based on slope position index. The canyons had the maximum of 63% and minimum was U-shaped valley with 1.04% for the landform of the area of interest. To achieve better results, there is a need to utilize a high spatial resolution remotely sensed DEM derived data and sensitivity analysis need to be incorporated. For that, laser scanning data is capable of improving the results.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: