Preventive IP: Notes on the State of Architectural Intellectual Property

Grau, U

Preventive IP: Notes on the State of Architectural Intellectual Property

Grau, U

Permalink

Publisher:: ACSA Press
Publication Type:: Chapter
Citation:: 102nd ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings, Globalizing Architecture: Flows and Disruptions, 2014, pp. 80 - 84
Issue Date:: 2014-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	ACSA.AM.102.10.pdf	Published version	241.08 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Grau, U https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-1615	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Stuart, J	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Wilson, M	en_US
dc.date.issued	2014-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	102nd ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings, Globalizing Architecture: Flows and Disruptions, 2014, pp. 80 - 84	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-0-935502-86-2	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/133449
dc.description.abstract	Architecture is probably the one creative field in which the flow of knowledge is least regulated. For instance, compare it to music or cinema in which copyright laws dictate the maximum length of the fragments that can be freely use by others. Think of the legal implications that terms such as plagiarism, quotation, or paraphrasing have in literature. Remember how intellectual property (IP) rights render illegal any transformation of a work of art not sanctioned by its author. Albeit architecture, since 1990,1 has enjoyed a legal status similar to these other fields, none of these principles seem to apply. In fact, IP regulations remain mostly underdeveloped and rarely enforced.	en_US
dc.publisher	ACSA Press	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	102nd ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings, Globalizing Architecture: Flows and Disruptions	en_US
dc.title	Preventive IP: Notes on the State of Architectural Intellectual Property	en_US
dc.type	Chapter
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Architecture
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

Architecture is probably the one creative field in which the flow of knowledge is least regulated. For instance, compare it to music or cinema in which copyright laws dictate the maximum length of the fragments that can be freely use by others. Think of the legal implications that terms such as plagiarism, quotation, or paraphrasing have in literature. Remember how intellectual property (IP) rights render illegal any transformation of a work of art not sanctioned by its author. Albeit architecture, since 1990,1 has enjoyed a legal status similar to these other fields, none of these principles seem to apply. In fact, IP regulations remain mostly underdeveloped and rarely enforced.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/133449