Is Corporal Punishment Torturous?
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2017, 34 (1), pp. 74 - 88
- Issue Date:
- 2017-02-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenta-2017-Journal_of_Applied_Philosophy.pdf | Published Version | 507.47 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© Society for Applied Philosophy, 2015 The aim of this article is to determine whether fixed courses of judicial corporal punishment (JCP) and non-abusive corporal punishment of children (CPC) amount to torture. I assess the reasons that have been offered for distinguishing fixed courses of JCP from torture and argue that none is successful. I argue that non-consensual JCP that inflicts severe pain is appropriately classifiable as torture, but that JCP that inflicts mild pain and entirely consensual JCP are not torturous. I consider whether any of the reasons offered for distinguishing JCP from torture can distinguish non-abusive CPC from torture given certain important differences between CPC and JCP. I submit that none of these reasons is successful. I consider other possible reasons for distinguishing non-abusive CPC that inflicts severe pain from torture and argue that none is successful. I conclude that fixed courses of non-consensual JCP which inflict severe pain and non-abusive CPC that inflicts severe pain are correctly classifiable as torture.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: