Global rules on conflict-of-laws matters in international insolvency law cases: An Australian perspective

Wellard, MN; Mason, RF

Global rules on conflict-of-laws matters in international insolvency law cases: An Australian perspective

Wellard, MN

Mason, RF

Permalink

Publisher:: Thomson Reuters (Australia)
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Insolvency Law Journal, 2015, 23 pp. 5 - 30
Issue Date:: 2015

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	BC550987-E904-461E-AA3B-69C3783A735C publisher version.pdf	Published Version	173.86 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wellard, MN https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-2079	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Mason, RF	en_US
dc.date.issued	2015	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Insolvency Law Journal, 2015, 23 pp. 5 - 30	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/134024
dc.description.abstract	The 2012 Report “Transnational Insolvency: Global Principles for Co-operation in International Insolvency Cases” – commissioned by The American Law Institute in conjunction with The International Insolvency Institute – annexed 23 “Global Rules on Conflict-of-Laws Matters in International Insolvency Cases”. These proposed “Global Rules” are intended to “serve as legislative recommendations” to (inter alia) promote uniformity and greater certainty in the unpredictable area of conflict of laws. This article provides a brief commentary upon the 23 proposed Global Rules from an Australian perspective (comparing the effect and intent of each rule with the current Australian conflict-of-laws position) and offers some conclusions as to the merits of the “Global Rules” initiative.	en_US
dc.publisher	Thomson Reuters (Australia)	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Insolvency Law Journal	en_US
dc.title	Global rules on conflict-of-laws matters in international insolvency law cases: An Australian perspective	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	23	en_US
utslib.for	1501 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.volume	23	en_US

Abstract:

The 2012 Report “Transnational Insolvency: Global Principles for Co-operation in International Insolvency Cases” – commissioned by The American Law Institute in conjunction with The International Insolvency Institute – annexed 23 “Global Rules on Conflict-of-Laws Matters in International Insolvency Cases”. These proposed “Global Rules” are intended to “serve as legislative recommendations” to (inter alia) promote uniformity and greater certainty in the unpredictable area of conflict of laws. This article provides a brief commentary upon the 23 proposed Global Rules from an Australian perspective (comparing the effect and intent of each rule with the current Australian conflict-of-laws position) and offers some conclusions as to the merits of the “Global Rules” initiative.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/134024