A holistic review of public-private partnership literature published between 2008 and 2018

Ma, L; Li, J; Jin, R; Ke, Y; Yuan, J

A holistic review of public-private partnership literature published between 2008 and 2018

Ma, L Li, J Jin, R Ke, Y

Yuan, J

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019
Issue Date:: 2019-01-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published VersionAdobe PDF (3.88 MB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Ma, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Li, J	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Jin, R	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Ke, Y https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3426-703X	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Yuan, J	en_US
dc.date.issued	2019-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1687-8086	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/136666
dc.description.abstract	© 2019 Liang Ma et al. Adopting a holistic approach in the review of the public-private partnership (PPP) literature published since 2008 by incorporating scientometric analysis and further systematic analysis, this study aims to provide the big picture of the state-of-the-art research in PPP by addressing major issues and suggesting research trends in PPP. Following a three-step research methodology, this study started from a bibliometric analysis with science mapping to provide the state-of-the-art information on PPP research keywords, scholars, journal articles, institutions, and countries. A further systematic review was also conducted to identify future research directions of PPP in project management. The review of the existing literature in PPP revealed that there had been insufficient systematic approach in summarizing the research topics and proposing new research trends in PPP-related project management. It was further indicated that sustainability and innovation in PPP could be further studied, such as integrating building information modeling with PPP. Factors related to barriers in PPP implementation would continue growing. Future research directions in PPP were also proposed following the systematic review, for example, comparative studies of PPP practice between developing and developed countries. The current study provides a comprehensive approach by integrating bibliometric analysis, science mapping, and qualitative analysis in the latest PPP research. It reveals the contemporary research themes in PPP and provides directions for near-future directions of PPP research in project management.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Advances in Civil Engineering	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1155/2019/7094653	en_US
dc.title	A holistic review of public-private partnership literature published between 2008 and 2018	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2019	en_US
utslib.for	1699 Other Studies in Human Society	en_US
utslib.for	0905 Civil Engineering	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Built Environment
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	2019	en_US

Abstract:

© 2019 Liang Ma et al. Adopting a holistic approach in the review of the public-private partnership (PPP) literature published since 2008 by incorporating scientometric analysis and further systematic analysis, this study aims to provide the big picture of the state-of-the-art research in PPP by addressing major issues and suggesting research trends in PPP. Following a three-step research methodology, this study started from a bibliometric analysis with science mapping to provide the state-of-the-art information on PPP research keywords, scholars, journal articles, institutions, and countries. A further systematic review was also conducted to identify future research directions of PPP in project management. The review of the existing literature in PPP revealed that there had been insufficient systematic approach in summarizing the research topics and proposing new research trends in PPP-related project management. It was further indicated that sustainability and innovation in PPP could be further studied, such as integrating building information modeling with PPP. Factors related to barriers in PPP implementation would continue growing. Future research directions in PPP were also proposed following the systematic review, for example, comparative studies of PPP practice between developing and developed countries. The current study provides a comprehensive approach by integrating bibliometric analysis, science mapping, and qualitative analysis in the latest PPP research. It reveals the contemporary research themes in PPP and provides directions for near-future directions of PPP research in project management.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/136666