Randomised trial of population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews: long-term outcomes
Manchanda, R
Burnell, M
Gaba, F
Desai, R
Wardle, J
Gessler, S
Side, L
Sanderson, S
Loggenberg, K
Brady, AF
Dorkins, H
Wallis, Y
Chapman, C
Jacobs, C
Legood, R
Beller, U
Tomlinson, I
Menon, U
Jacobs, I
Legood, R
Beller, U
Tomlinson, I
Menon, U
Jacobs, I
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2020, 127 (3), pp. 364 - 375
- Issue Date:
- 2020-02-01
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
© 2019 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Objective: Unselected population-based BRCA testing provides the opportunity to apply genomics on a population-scale to maximise primary prevention for breast-and-ovarian cancer. We compare long-term outcomes of population-based and family-history (FH)/clinical-criteria-based BRCA testing on psychological health and quality of life. Design: Randomised controlled trial (RCT) (ISRCTN73338115) GCaPPS, with two-arms: (i) population-screening (PS); (ii) FH/clinical-criteria-based testing. Setting: North London Ashkenazi-Jewish (AJ) population. Population/Sample: AJ women/men. Methods: Population-based RCT (1:1). Participants were recruited through self-referral, following pre-test genetic counselling from the North London AJ population. Inclusion criteria: AJ women/men >18 years old; exclusion-criteria: prior BRCA testing or first-degree relatives of BRCA-carriers. Interventions: Genetic testing for three Jewish BRCA founder-mutations: 185delAG (c.68_69delAG), 5382insC (c.5266dupC) and 6174delT (c.5946delT), for (i) all participants in PS arm; (ii) those fulfilling FH/clinical criteria in FH arm. Linear mixed models and appropriate contrast tests were used to analyse the impact of BRCA testing on psychological and quality-of-life outcomes over 3 years. Main outcome measures: Validated questionnaires (HADS/MICRA/HAI/SF12) used to analyse psychological wellbeing/quality-of-life outcomes at baseline/1-year/2-year/3-year follow up. Results: In all, 1034 individuals (691 women, 343 men) were randomised to PS (n = 530) or FH (n = 504) arms. There was a statistically significant decrease in anxiety (P = 0.046) and total anxiety-&-depression scores (P = 0.0.012) in the PS arm compared with the FH arm over 3 years. No significant difference was observed between the FH and PS arms for depression, health-anxiety, distress, uncertainty, quality-of-life or experience scores associated with BRCA testing. Contrast tests showed a decrease in anxiety (P = 0.018), health-anxiety (P < 0.0005) and quality-of-life (P = 0.004) scores in both PS and FH groups over time. Eighteen of 30 (60%) BRCA carriers identified did not fulfil clinical criteria for BRCA testing. Total BRCA prevalence was 2.9% (95% CI 1.97–4.12%), BRCA1 prevalence was 1.55% (95% CI 0.89–2.5%) and BRCA2 prevalence was 1.35% (95% CI 0.74–2.26%). Conclusion: Population-based AJ BRCA testing does not adversely affect long-term psychological wellbeing or quality-of-life, decreases anxiety and could identify up to 150% additional BRCA carriers. Tweetable abstract: Population BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews reduces anxiety and does not adversely affect psychological health or quality of life.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: