Receiving Bad News: A Thematic Analysis of Stroke Survivor Experiences.

Maddern, R; Kneebone, II

Receiving Bad News: A Thematic Analysis of Stroke Survivor Experiences.

Maddern, R Kneebone, II

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: J Patient Exp, 2019, 6 (4), pp. 271 - 277
Issue Date:: 2019-12

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published VersionAdobe PDF (196.08 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Maddern, R	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Kneebone, II https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-7264	en_US
dc.date.issued	2019-12	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	J Patient Exp, 2019, 6 (4), pp. 271 - 277	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	2374-3735	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/137839
dc.description.abstract	Background: Breaking bad news to patients may be required in service provision to stroke survivors. While challenging, it may be critical to the retention of optimism and participation in rehabilitation. Objectives: To explore the experience of stroke survivors when receiving bad news (RBN) from medical practitioners. Methods: Data were obtained via 1:1 interviews conducted at stroke support groups with survivors at least 12 months into recovery and subsequently transcribed for thematic analysis and coded using NVivo. Results: Eight of 10 participants experienced RBN, and 2 participants did not. The themes of being "lucky to be alive" and waiting for "delayed information" were expressed by all participants early in the interviews. Three sub-themes emerged and were labelled alliance, dissent, and dissatisfaction, each with a further 3 contextual themes. The perception of RBN was marked amongst the dissent and dissatisfaction groups, with the latter reporting negative implications for their rehabilitation as well as negative emotions, such as anger and anxiety. The perception of a poor-quality relationship with medical practitioners was said to impede rehabilitation and recovery processes. The dissent group was characterized by initial disbelief after RBN and consequently poorer long-term outcomes, whilst the Alliance group experienced very good quality of care due to existing personal knowledge and therefore did not perceive RBN during their early medical meetings. Conclusions: In the period soon after their stroke, survivors required their medical practitioners to not only communicate knowledge and information, but also needed validation of their hopes and fears for the future from an empathically attuned clinician.	en_US
dc.language	eng	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	J Patient Exp	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1177/2374373518803613	en_US
dc.title	Receiving Bad News: A Thematic Analysis of Stroke Survivor Experiences.	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	4	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	6	en_US
utslib.location.activity	United States	en_US
utslib.for	1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology	en_US
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Graduate School of Health
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.issue	4	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	6	en_US

Abstract:

Background: Breaking bad news to patients may be required in service provision to stroke survivors. While challenging, it may be critical to the retention of optimism and participation in rehabilitation. Objectives: To explore the experience of stroke survivors when receiving bad news (RBN) from medical practitioners. Methods: Data were obtained via 1:1 interviews conducted at stroke support groups with survivors at least 12 months into recovery and subsequently transcribed for thematic analysis and coded using NVivo. Results: Eight of 10 participants experienced RBN, and 2 participants did not. The themes of being "lucky to be alive" and waiting for "delayed information" were expressed by all participants early in the interviews. Three sub-themes emerged and were labelled alliance, dissent, and dissatisfaction, each with a further 3 contextual themes. The perception of RBN was marked amongst the dissent and dissatisfaction groups, with the latter reporting negative implications for their rehabilitation as well as negative emotions, such as anger and anxiety. The perception of a poor-quality relationship with medical practitioners was said to impede rehabilitation and recovery processes. The dissent group was characterized by initial disbelief after RBN and consequently poorer long-term outcomes, whilst the Alliance group experienced very good quality of care due to existing personal knowledge and therefore did not perceive RBN during their early medical meetings. Conclusions: In the period soon after their stroke, survivors required their medical practitioners to not only communicate knowledge and information, but also needed validation of their hopes and fears for the future from an empathically attuned clinician.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/137839