Law Viewed Through the Lens of Neurointerventions

Vincent, N; Nadelhoffer, T; McCay, A

Law Viewed Through the Lens of Neurointerventions

Vincent, N

Nadelhoffer, T McCay, A

Permalink

Publisher:: Oxford University Press
Publication Type:: Chapter
Citation:: Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity, 2020, pp. 1-30
Issue Date:: 2020-06-19

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Law_Viewed_Through_the_Lens_of_Neurointerventions.pdf	Published version	415.7 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Vincent, N https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-2318
dc.contributor.author	Nadelhoffer, T
dc.contributor.author	McCay, A
dc.contributor.editor	Vincent, N https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-2318
dc.contributor.editor	Nadelhoffer, T
dc.contributor.editor	McCay, A
dc.date.accessioned	2020-08-28T00:48:33Z
dc.date.available	2020-08-28T00:48:33Z
dc.date.issued	2020-06-19
dc.identifier.citation	Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity, 2020, pp. 1-30
dc.identifier.isbn	9780190651145
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/142408
dc.description.abstract	The development of modern diagnostic neuroimaging techniques led to discoveries about the human brain and mind that helped give rise to the field of neurolaw. This new interdisciplinary field has led analytic jurisprudence and philosophy of law in novel directions by providing an empirically informed platform from which scholars have reassessed topics such as mental privacy and self-determination, responsibility and its relationship to mental disorders, and the proper aims of criminal law. Similarly, the development of neurointervention techniques that promise to deliver new ways of altering people’s minds (by intervening in their brains) creates opportunities and challenges that raise important and rich conceptual, moral, jurisprudential, and scientific questions, and help us to tease apart analytic jurisprudence from synthetic jurisprudence. This volume advances the field of neurolaw by investigating issues raised by the development and use of neurointerventions (actual, proposed, and potential) to regulate human mental capacity, and those raised by the law’s regulation of the use of neurointerventions.
dc.format.extent	17
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Oxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartof	Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1093/oso/9780190651145.003.0001
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title	Law Viewed Through the Lens of Neurointerventions
dc.type	Chapter
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	true
dc.date.updated	2020-08-28T00:48:29Z
pubs.place-of-publication	New York, NY
pubs.publication-status	Published
dc.location	New York, NY

Abstract:

The development of modern diagnostic neuroimaging techniques led to discoveries about the human brain and mind that helped give rise to the field of neurolaw. This new interdisciplinary field has led analytic jurisprudence and philosophy of law in novel directions by providing an empirically informed platform from which scholars have reassessed topics such as mental privacy and self-determination, responsibility and its relationship to mental disorders, and the proper aims of criminal law. Similarly, the development of neurointervention techniques that promise to deliver new ways of altering people’s minds (by intervening in their brains) creates opportunities and challenges that raise important and rich conceptual, moral, jurisprudential, and scientific questions, and help us to tease apart analytic jurisprudence from synthetic jurisprudence. This volume advances the field of neurolaw by investigating issues raised by the development and use of neurointerventions (actual, proposed, and potential) to regulate human mental capacity, and those raised by the law’s regulation of the use of neurointerventions.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/142408