A systematic review of emotion regulation measurement in children and adolescents diagnosed with intellectual disabilities

Girgis, M; Paparo, J; Kneebone, I

A systematic review of emotion regulation measurement in children and adolescents diagnosed with intellectual disabilities

Girgis, M Paparo, J Kneebone, I

Permalink

Publisher:: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 2020
Issue Date:: 2020-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	A systematic review of emotion regulation measurement in children and adolescents diagnosed with intellectual disabilities.pdf	Accepted Manuscript Version	1.38 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Girgis, M
dc.contributor.author	Paparo, J
dc.contributor.author	Kneebone, I https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-7264
dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-09T23:40:38Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-09T23:40:38Z
dc.date.issued	2020-01-01
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 2020
dc.identifier.issn	1366-8250
dc.identifier.issn	1469-9532
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/142600
dc.description.abstract	© 2020 Australasian Society for Intellectual Disability, Inc. Background: Emotion regulation is a challenge for many, in particular children with intellectual disabilities. To support understanding and the development of interventions in this area it is essential to identify valid and reliable measures. Method: This systematic review aimed to identify measures that assess all five emotion regulation domains as described by the process model of emotion regulation; situation selection, situation modification, attention deployment, cognitive control, and response modulation. The validity and reliability of these measures was determined by the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Results: Of the 10 measures identified, only the Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale possessed moderate levels of evidence. However, this measure does not assess all five domains of emotion regulation. Conclusions: Future research would benefit from the development of both informant and self-report measures for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities, that assess all the five domains of emotion regulation.
dc.language	English
dc.publisher	ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.3109/13668250.2020.1784520
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1103 Clinical Sciences, 1607 Social Work, 1608 Sociology
dc.subject.classification	Rehabilitation
dc.title	A systematic review of emotion regulation measurement in children and adolescents diagnosed with intellectual disabilities
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences
utslib.for	1607 Social Work
utslib.for	1608 Sociology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health/GSH.Clinical Psychology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2020-09-09T23:40:30Z
pubs.publication-status	Published

Abstract:

© 2020 Australasian Society for Intellectual Disability, Inc. Background: Emotion regulation is a challenge for many, in particular children with intellectual disabilities. To support understanding and the development of interventions in this area it is essential to identify valid and reliable measures. Method: This systematic review aimed to identify measures that assess all five emotion regulation domains as described by the process model of emotion regulation; situation selection, situation modification, attention deployment, cognitive control, and response modulation. The validity and reliability of these measures was determined by the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Results: Of the 10 measures identified, only the Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale possessed moderate levels of evidence. However, this measure does not assess all five domains of emotion regulation. Conclusions: Future research would benefit from the development of both informant and self-report measures for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities, that assess all the five domains of emotion regulation.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/142600