An Argumentation Agent Models Evaluative Criteria

Debenham, JK

An Argumentation Agent Models Evaluative Criteria

Debenham, JK

Permalink

Publisher:: Springer
Publication Type:: Chapter
Citation:: Artificial Intelligence Applications And Innovations III. Book series IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Volume 296/2009, 2009, 1, pp. 81 - 86
Issue Date:: 2009-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2009004939OK.pdf		6.91 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Debenham, JK	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Iliadis, L	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Vlahavas, I	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Bramer, M	en_US
dc.date.issued	2009-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Artificial Intelligence Applications And Innovations III. Book series IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Volume 296/2009, 2009, 1, pp. 81 - 86	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-1-4419-0220-7	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/14275
dc.description.abstract	An approach to argumentation attempts to model the partner's evaluative criteria, and by attempting to work with it rather than against it. To this end, the utterances generated aim to influence the partner to believe what we believe to be in his best interestsâ although it may not be in fact. The utterances aim to convey what is so, and not to point out âwhere the partner is wrongâ . This behaviour is intended to lead to the development of lasting relationships between agents.	en_US
dc.publisher	Springer	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Artificial Intelligence Applications And Innovations III. Book series IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Volume 296/2009	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-1-4419-0221-4_11	en_US
dc.title	An Argumentation Agent Models Evaluative Criteria	en_US
dc.type	Chapter
utslib.location	USA	en_US
utslib.for	0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
utslib.citation.edition	1	en_US
dc.location.activity	Coffs Harbour, NSW
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - AAI - Advanced Analytics Institute Research Centre
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.edition	1	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	USA	en_US

Abstract:

An approach to argumentation attempts to model the partner's evaluative criteria, and by attempting to work with it rather than against it. To this end, the utterances generated aim to influence the partner to believe what we believe to be in his best interestsâ although it may not be in fact. The utterances aim to convey what is so, and not to point out âwhere the partner is wrongâ . This behaviour is intended to lead to the development of lasting relationships between agents.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/14275