Conflict and Contradictions of Multiple Hard Planning spaces

Pham, K; Pugalis, L

Conflict and Contradictions of Multiple Hard Planning spaces

Pham, K Pugalis, L

Permalink

Publisher:: APO
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: 2020, pp. 1-13
Issue Date:: 2020

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (1.38 MB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Pham, K
dc.contributor.author	Pugalis, L https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8987-6356
dc.date	2019-11-20
dc.date.accessioned	2020-10-09T23:48:35Z
dc.date.available	2020-10-09T23:48:35Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.citation	2020, pp. 1-13
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/143208
dc.description.abstract	Spatial imaginaries feature prominently in contemporary metropolitan strategic planning strategies. In particular, many metropolitan planners have experimented with the use of functional economic corridors, typically although not exclusively based on soft or fuzzy boundaries. In the last 15 years, there have been four strategic planning strategies produced for metropolitan Sydney in 2005, 2010, 2014 and 2018. Whilst the first three experimented with soft functional economic corridors, the most recent strategy, a ‘metropolis of three cities’, which seeks to rebalance the spatial structure of the metropolitan region, witnesses the hardening of the Greater Parramatta and Olympic Peninsula functional economic corridor. The insertion of this new planning space alongside and cutting across existing statutory planning areas gives rise to new issues and opportunities. Drawing attention to the coexistence of multiple hard planning spaces, this research examines some ensuing conflicts and contradictions that are not always immediately apparent. Moreover, the paper considers the broader implications of multiple hard planning spaces in both local development and metropolitan strategic planning.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	APO
dc.relation.ispartof	State of Australian Cities Conference and PhD Symposium
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title	Conflict and Contradictions of Multiple Hard Planning spaces
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location.activity	Perth, Western Australia
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - IPPG - Institute for Public Policy and Governance
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)/lnstitute for Public Policy and Governance
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	false
dc.date.updated	2020-10-09T23:48:32Z
pubs.finish-date	2020-12-05
pubs.place-of-publication	Australia
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.start-date	2019-11-20
dc.location	Australia

Abstract:

Spatial imaginaries feature prominently in contemporary metropolitan strategic planning strategies. In particular, many metropolitan planners have experimented with the use of functional economic corridors, typically although not exclusively based on soft or fuzzy boundaries. In the last 15 years, there have been four strategic planning strategies produced for metropolitan Sydney in 2005, 2010, 2014 and 2018. Whilst the first three experimented with soft functional economic corridors, the most recent strategy, a ‘metropolis of three cities’, which seeks to rebalance the spatial structure of the metropolitan region, witnesses the hardening of the Greater Parramatta and Olympic Peninsula functional economic corridor. The insertion of this new planning space alongside and cutting across existing statutory planning areas gives rise to new issues and opportunities. Drawing attention to the coexistence of multiple hard planning spaces, this research examines some ensuing conflicts and contradictions that are not always immediately apparent. Moreover, the paper considers the broader implications of multiple hard planning spaces in both local development and metropolitan strategic planning.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/143208