International Status in the Shadow of Empire Nauru and the Histories of International Law
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Publication Type:
- Book
- Citation:
- 2020, pp. 1-318
- Issue Date:
- 2020-06-30
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Front matter.Final proofs.16 April 2020.for Symplectic.pdf | Published version | 113.58 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Nauru is often figured as an anomaly in the international order. This book offers a new account of Nauru's imperial history and examines its significance to the histories of international law. Drawing on theories of jurisdiction and bureaucracy, it reconstructs four shifts in Nauru's status – from German protectorate, to League of Nations C Mandate, to UN Trust Territory, to sovereign state – as a means of redescribing the transition from the nineteenth century imperial order to the twentieth century state system. The book argues that as international status shifts, imperial form accretes: as Nauru's status shifted, what occurred at the local level was a gradual process of bureaucratisation. Two conclusions emerge from this argument. The first is that imperial administration in Nauru produced the Republic's post-independence 'failures'. The second is that international recognition of sovereign status is best understood as marking a beginning, not an end, of the process of decolonisation.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: