Re-defining Gendered Harm and Institutions under Colonialism: #MeToo in Australia
- Publisher:
- Taylor and Francis
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Australian Feminist Studies, 2020, 35, (105), pp. 244-260
- Issue Date:
- 2020-11-30
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re defining Gendered Harm and Institutions under Colonialism MeToo in Australia.pdf | Published version | 1.44 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Law's imaginary and logics are notoriously limited in their ways of thinking through and adjudicating sexual violence. The #MeToo movement is in large part a public, extra-legal response to the inadequacies of liberal law in responding to sexual violence. #MeToo has purportedly interrogated liberal institutions and the operation of gender within them. In particular, #MeToo has shown that gendered harm is a normalised part of the operation of liberal institutions. But more needs to be done within #MeToo to interrogate these concepts and to decolonise #MeToo. We need to decolonise and historicise the concepts of ‘gendered harm' and ‘institutions’ in order to understand how these have failed and, at times, even been weaponized against Indigenous women. This article provides a reading of Australian liberal institutions and recent historical processes with a view to showing how these institutions need to be interpreted in view of a decolonial praxis of #MeToo.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: