Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics).

Nisselle, A; Janinski, M; Martyn, M; McClaren, B; Kaunein, N; Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group,; Barlow-Stewart, K; Belcher, A; Bernat, JA; Best, S; Bishop, M; Carroll, JC; Cornel, M; Dissanayake, VHW; Dodds, A; Dunlop, K; Garg, G; Gear, R; Graves, D; Knight, K; Korf, B; Kumar, D; Laurino, M; Ma, A; Maguire, J; Mallett, A; McCarthy, M; McEwen, A; Mulder, N; Patel, C; Quinlan, C; Reed, K; Riggs, ER; Sinnerbrink, I; Slavotinek, A; Suppiah, V; Terrill, B; Tobias, ES; Tonkin, E; Trumble, S; Wessels, T-M; Metcalfe, S; Jordan, H; Gaff, C

Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics).

Nisselle, A Janinski, M Martyn, M McClaren, B Kaunein, N Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group, Barlow-Stewart, K Belcher, A Bernat, JA Best, S Bishop, M Carroll, JC Cornel, M Dissanayake, VHW Dodds, A Dunlop, K Garg, G Gear, R Graves, D Knight, K Korf, B Kumar, D Laurino, M Ma, A Maguire, J

Mallett, A McCarthy, M McEwen, A

Mulder, N Patel, C Quinlan, C Reed, K Riggs, ER Sinnerbrink, I Slavotinek, A Suppiah, V Terrill, B Tobias, ES Tonkin, E Trumble, S Wessels, T-M Metcalfe, S Jordan, H Gaff, C

Permalink

Publisher:: SPRINGERNATURE
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021
Issue Date:: 2021-04-06

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Nisselle et al 2020 GiM Rep stds_210204_manuscript_tracked (2).docx		154.81 kB	Unknown	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Nisselle, A
dc.contributor.author	Janinski, M
dc.contributor.author	Martyn, M
dc.contributor.author	McClaren, B
dc.contributor.author	Kaunein, N
dc.contributor.author	Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group,
dc.contributor.author	Barlow-Stewart, K
dc.contributor.author	Belcher, A
dc.contributor.author	Bernat, JA
dc.contributor.author	Best, S
dc.contributor.author	Bishop, M
dc.contributor.author	Carroll, JC
dc.contributor.author	Cornel, M
dc.contributor.author	Dissanayake, VHW
dc.contributor.author	Dodds, A
dc.contributor.author	Dunlop, K
dc.contributor.author	Garg, G
dc.contributor.author	Gear, R
dc.contributor.author	Graves, D
dc.contributor.author	Knight, K
dc.contributor.author	Korf, B
dc.contributor.author	Kumar, D
dc.contributor.author	Laurino, M
dc.contributor.author	Ma, A
dc.contributor.author	Maguire, J https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5722-8311
dc.contributor.author	Mallett, A
dc.contributor.author	McCarthy, M
dc.contributor.author	McEwen, A https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8705-1190
dc.contributor.author	Mulder, N
dc.contributor.author	Patel, C
dc.contributor.author	Quinlan, C
dc.contributor.author	Reed, K
dc.contributor.author	Riggs, ER
dc.contributor.author	Sinnerbrink, I
dc.contributor.author	Slavotinek, A
dc.contributor.author	Suppiah, V
dc.contributor.author	Terrill, B
dc.contributor.author	Tobias, ES
dc.contributor.author	Tonkin, E
dc.contributor.author	Trumble, S
dc.contributor.author	Wessels, T-M
dc.contributor.author	Metcalfe, S
dc.contributor.author	Jordan, H
dc.contributor.author	Gaff, C
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-10T07:20:59Z
dc.date.available	2021-02-26
dc.date.available	2021-06-10T07:20:59Z
dc.date.issued	2021-04-06
dc.identifier.citation	Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021
dc.identifier.issn	1098-3600
dc.identifier.issn	1530-0366
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/149495
dc.description.abstract	<h4>Purpose</h4>Widespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process to develop a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of design, development, delivery, and evaluation of genomics education interventions.<h4>Methods</h4>Draft standards were derived from literature (25 items from 21 publications). Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited for three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility, and design.<h4>Results</h4>The final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and 1 on stakeholder engagement.<h4>Conclusion</h4>These Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency, and comprehensiveness of reporting. Consequently, the genomics education evidence base will be more robust, enabling high-quality education and evaluation across diverse settings.
dc.format	Print-Electronic
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	SPRINGERNATURE
dc.relation.ispartof	Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	0604 Genetics, 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject.classification	Genetics & Heredity
dc.title	Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics).
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.location.activity	United States
utslib.for	0604 Genetics
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health/GSH.Genetic Counselling
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2021-06-10T07:20:57Z
pubs.publication-status	Published

Abstract:

Purpose

Widespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process to develop a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of design, development, delivery, and evaluation of genomics education interventions.

Methods

Draft standards were derived from literature (25 items from 21 publications). Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited for three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility, and design.

Results

The final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and 1 on stakeholder engagement.

Conclusion

These Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency, and comprehensiveness of reporting. Consequently, the genomics education evidence base will be more robust, enabling high-quality education and evaluation across diverse settings.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/149495