'The Mises Network and Climate Policy': Policy Briefing No. 2.

Plehwe, D; Goldenbaum, M; Ramanujam, A; McKie, R; Ekberg, K; Hall, G; Walker, J; Araldi, L; Brulle, R; Neujeffski, M; Graham, N; Hrubes, M; Slobodian, Q

'The Mises Network and Climate Policy': Policy Briefing No. 2.

Plehwe, D Goldenbaum, M Ramanujam, A McKie, R Ekberg, K Hall, G Walker, J

Araldi, L Brulle, R Neujeffski, M Graham, N Hrubes, M Slobodian, Q

Permalink

Publisher:: Climate Social Science Network
Publication Type:: Other
Citation:: 2021, pp. 1-27
Issue Date:: 2021-07-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	CSSN-Mises-Research-Report.pdf		2.49 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Plehwe, D
dc.contributor.author	Goldenbaum, M
dc.contributor.author	Ramanujam, A
dc.contributor.author	McKie, R
dc.contributor.author	Ekberg, K
dc.contributor.author	Hall, G
dc.contributor.author	Walker, J https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-3457
dc.contributor.author	Araldi, L
dc.contributor.author	Brulle, R
dc.contributor.author	Neujeffski, M
dc.contributor.author	Graham, N
dc.contributor.author	Hrubes, M
dc.contributor.author	Slobodian, Q
dc.date.accessioned	2021-07-22T22:51:21Z
dc.date.available	2021-07-22T22:51:21Z
dc.date.issued	2021-07-01
dc.identifier.citation	2021, pp. 1-27
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/149917
dc.description.abstract	Think tanks have played a decisive role in the organised obstruction of climate action, denying, minimising, or derailing ambitious climate change mitigation. This research briefing reviews the case of the Ludwig von Mises Institutes and the Property and Freedom Society, a network of ultra-libertarian groups active around the world, which we refer to as the Mises Institute Network in the mobilisation and the dissemination of climate policy opposition discourse. We review the origins, the history, the global distribution and the climate-related output of 31 Mises Institutes between 2000 and 2021. Our analysis reveals climate obstruction messaging based on a critique of climate science, principled objections to state intervention and planning and the social forces supporting climate change mitigation, as well as advocacy of free-market environmentalism as a suitable alternative to established climate politics. While Mises social theory includes a determined critique of environmentalism, it paid limited attention to climate change before 2016. From 2016, there has been a concerted effort to disseminate climate opposition discourse featuring a clear spike in published articles during 2019. Contextually, 2019 saw the U.S.Green New Deal proposal and the European Union Green Deal decision suggesting a tipping point for advocating free-market environmentalism in response to climate change to contend the increased state intervention discourse emerging in domestic and international climate policy planning. Additionally, ties exist between scholars of Mises Institutes to a broad range of business groups ranging from gold, trade and investment firms in Germany,tobacco companies in the U.S., business school, consulting and service firms in Spain, and metal employer association and financial groups in Sweden. Furthermore, the network is engaging in an international effort to recruit new members into the ultra-libertarian movement, with an active university presence and active online campaign to spread Mises’ philosophy and recruit more members, particularly students and young people, to the movement. Despite the lack of transparency and limited evidence of fossil industry funding, the Mises Network of think tanks has a clear voice in the denial and delaying think tank train, gaining speed at this pivotal moment in time. Our results indicate a dedicated effort to spread climate change opposition messages across the network. The core ideology of the Austrian economics tradition related to Ludwig von Mises provides the climate change opposition with a straightforward repertoire of arguments. Put simply, the coordinated activities of Mises Institutes across countries illustrates an attempt to circulate widely opposition to climate policy based on the radicalism of Mises social theory that focuses on resistance to government intervention and a form of market fundamentalism as a primer to maintain business as usual at the behest of the planet.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Climate Social Science Network
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title	'The Mises Network and Climate Policy': Policy Briefing No. 2.
dc.type	Other
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/Social and Political Sciences Program
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2021-07-22T22:51:18Z
pubs.confidential	false
pubs.place-of-publication	Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Rhode Island USA
dc.location	Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Rhode Island USA

Abstract:

Think tanks have played a decisive role in the organised obstruction of climate action, denying, minimising, or derailing ambitious climate change mitigation. This research briefing reviews the case of the Ludwig von Mises Institutes and the Property and Freedom Society, a network of ultra-libertarian groups active around the world, which we refer to as the Mises Institute Network in the mobilisation and the dissemination of climate policy opposition discourse. We review the origins, the history, the global distribution and the climate-related output of 31 Mises Institutes between 2000 and 2021. Our analysis reveals climate obstruction messaging based on a critique of climate science, principled objections to state intervention and planning and the social forces supporting climate change mitigation, as well as advocacy of free-market environmentalism as a suitable alternative to established climate politics. While Mises social theory includes a determined critique of environmentalism, it paid limited attention to climate change before 2016. From 2016, there has been a concerted effort to disseminate climate opposition discourse featuring a clear spike in published articles during 2019. Contextually, 2019 saw the U.S.Green New Deal proposal and the European Union Green Deal decision suggesting a tipping point for advocating free-market environmentalism in response to climate change to contend the increased state intervention discourse emerging in domestic and international climate policy planning. Additionally, ties exist between scholars of Mises Institutes to a broad range of business groups ranging from gold, trade and investment firms in Germany,tobacco companies in the U.S., business school, consulting and service firms in Spain, and metal employer association and financial groups in Sweden. Furthermore, the network is engaging in an international effort to recruit new members into the ultra-libertarian movement, with an active university presence and active online campaign to spread Mises’ philosophy and recruit more members, particularly students and young people, to the movement. Despite the lack of transparency and limited evidence of fossil industry funding, the Mises Network of think tanks has a clear voice in the denial and delaying think tank train, gaining speed at this pivotal moment in time. Our results indicate a dedicated effort to spread climate change opposition messages across the network. The core ideology of the Austrian economics tradition related to Ludwig von Mises provides the climate change opposition with a straightforward repertoire of arguments. Put simply, the coordinated activities of Mises Institutes across countries illustrates an attempt to circulate widely opposition to climate policy based on the radicalism of Mises social theory that focuses on resistance to government intervention and a form of market fundamentalism as a primer to maintain business as usual at the behest of the planet.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/149917