Family communication about genomic sequencing: A qualitative study with cancer patients and relatives.
Smit, AK
Bartley, N
Best, MC
Napier, CE
Butow, P
Newson, AJ
Tucker, K
Ballinger, ML
Thomas, DM
Jacobs, C
Meiser, B
Goldstein, D
Savard, J
Juraskova, I
PiGeOn authorship group,
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Patient Education and Counseling, 2021, 104, (5), pp. 944-952
- Issue Date:
- 2021
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0738399120305590-main.pdf | 443.66 kB | Adobe PDF |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Smit, AK | |
dc.contributor.author | Bartley, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Best, MC | |
dc.contributor.author | Napier, CE | |
dc.contributor.author | Butow, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Newson, AJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Tucker, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Ballinger, ML | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, DM | |
dc.contributor.author |
Jacobs, C https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9557-9080 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Meiser, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Goldstein, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Savard, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Juraskova, I | |
dc.contributor.author | PiGeOn authorship group, | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-11T04:10:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-15 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-11T04:10:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Patient Education and Counseling, 2021, 104, (5), pp. 944-952 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0738-3991 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-5134 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/150990 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective This study explored family communication about undertaking genomic sequencing, and intentions to communicate pertinent heritable results to family members. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with cancer patients (n = 53) and their relatives (n = 20) who underwent germline genome sequencing or molecular tumor testing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Key themes relevant to family communication about undertaking sequencing included: perceiving family member interest, delaying discussion until results were received, having shared capacity to understand and cope, and having open communication in the family. Intended communication subsequent to receiving results was affected by: disease severity, risk management options, degree of closeness in the family, sense of responsibility, and potential adverse impacts on family. Resource and support needs varied based on the complexity of test results, health professionals’ availability, and disease severity. Unique subthemes were identified for specific subgroups. Conclusion Current findings support the need to assess the impact and resource needs specific to each clinical application of genomic sequencing. Practice implications Increasingly sophisticated and complex clinical genomic sequencing warrants development of family-centered interventions and resources to facilitate preference-sensitive communication about genomic sequencing, including disseminating relevant information to family members. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Patient Education and Counseling | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.022 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | Public Health | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Communication | |
dc.subject.mesh | Family | |
dc.subject.mesh | Genomics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Communication | |
dc.subject.mesh | Family | |
dc.subject.mesh | Genomics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.title | Family communication about genomic sequencing: A qualitative study with cancer patients and relatives. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 104 | |
utslib.location.activity | Ireland | |
utslib.for | 11 Medical and Health Sciences | |
utslib.for | 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health/GSH.Genetic Counselling | |
utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
pubs.consider-herdc | false | |
dc.date.updated | 2021-10-11T04:10:44Z | |
pubs.issue | 5 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 104 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 5 |
Abstract:
Objective
This study explored family communication about undertaking genomic sequencing, and intentions to communicate pertinent heritable results to family members.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with cancer patients (n = 53) and their relatives (n = 20) who underwent germline genome sequencing or molecular tumor testing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
Key themes relevant to family communication about undertaking sequencing included: perceiving family member interest, delaying discussion until results were received, having shared capacity to understand and cope, and having open communication in the family. Intended communication subsequent to receiving results was affected by: disease severity, risk management options, degree of closeness in the family, sense of responsibility, and potential adverse impacts on family. Resource and support needs varied based on the complexity of test results, health professionals’ availability, and disease severity. Unique subthemes were identified for specific subgroups.
Conclusion
Current findings support the need to assess the impact and resource needs specific to each clinical application of genomic sequencing.
Practice implications
Increasingly sophisticated and complex clinical genomic sequencing warrants development of family-centered interventions and resources to facilitate preference-sensitive communication about genomic sequencing, including disseminating relevant information to family members.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph