What do we talk about when we talk about queer death?/1 Theories and definitions

Manganas, N; MacCormack, P; Radomska, M; Lykke, N; Illerup Hansen, I; Olson, P

What do we talk about when we talk about queer death?/1 Theories and definitions

Manganas, N

MacCormack, P Radomska, M Lykke, N Illerup Hansen, I Olson, P

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Whatever. A Transdisciplinary Journal of Queer Theories and Studies, 2021, 4, pp. 573-598
Issue Date:: 2021-07-01

Recently Added

	Filename	Description	Size
	document (2).pdf	Published version	321.76 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is new to OPUS and is not currently available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Manganas, N https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-2531
dc.contributor.author	MacCormack, P
dc.contributor.author	Radomska, M
dc.contributor.author	Lykke, N
dc.contributor.author	Illerup Hansen, I
dc.contributor.author	Olson, P
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-13T07:08:25Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-13T07:08:25Z
dc.date.issued	2021-07-01
dc.identifier.citation	Whatever. A Transdisciplinary Journal of Queer Theories and Studies, 2021, 4, pp. 573-598
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/151552
dc.description.abstract	This is part 1 of 6 of the dossier What Do We Talk about when We Talk about Queer Death?, edited by M. Petricola. The contributions collected in this article sit at the crossroads be-tween thanatology and queer theory and tackle questions such as: how can we define queer death studies as a research field? How can queer death studies problematize and rethink the life-death binary? Which notions and hermeneutic tools could be borrowed from other disciplines in order to better define queer death studies?Thepresent article includes the following contributions: – MacCormack P., What does queer death studies mean?; – Radomska M., On queering death studies; – Lykke N., Death as vibrancy; – Hillerup Hansen I., What concreteness will do to resolve the uncertain; – Olson P., Queer ob-jectivity as a response to denials of death; – Manganas N., The queer lack of a chthonic instinct.
dc.language	en
dc.relation.ispartof	Whatever. A Transdisciplinary Journal of Queer Theories and Studies
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.13131/2611-657X.whatever.v4i1.147
dc.rights	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Whatever is an open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. Our articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Licence 4.0 by-nc, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.title	What do we talk about when we talk about queer death?/1 Theories and definitions
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	4
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
utslib.copyright.status	recently_added	*
pubs.consider-herdc	true
dc.date.updated	2021-11-13T07:08:24Z
pubs.publication-status	Published online
pubs.volume	4

Abstract:

This is part 1 of 6 of the dossier What Do We Talk about when We Talk about Queer Death?, edited by M. Petricola. The contributions collected in this article sit at the crossroads be-tween thanatology and queer theory and tackle questions such as: how can we define queer death studies as a research field? How can queer death studies problematize and rethink the life-death binary? Which notions and hermeneutic tools could be borrowed from other disciplines in order to better define queer death studies?Thepresent article includes the following contributions: – MacCormack P., What does queer death studies mean?; – Radomska M., On queering death studies; – Lykke N., Death as vibrancy; – Hillerup Hansen I., What concreteness will do to resolve the uncertain; – Olson P., Queer ob-jectivity as a response to denials of death; – Manganas N., The queer lack of a chthonic instinct.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/151552