Promoting cultural rigour through critical appraisal tools in First Nations peoples' research.
- Publisher:
- Wiley Open Access
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2021, 45, (3), pp. 210-211
- Issue Date:
- 2021-06
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lock, MJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Walker, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Browne, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-09T02:11:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-01 | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-09T02:11:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2021, 45, (3), pp. 210-211 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1326-0200 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1753-6405 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/154324 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To highlight the emerging ethos of cultural rigour in the use of critical appraisal tools in research involving First Nations peoples. METHODS: Critical reflection on recent systematic review experience. RESULTS: The concept of cultural rigour is notably undefined in peer-reviewed journal articles but is evident in the development of critical appraisal tools developed by First Nations peoples. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional critical appraisal tools for assessing study quality are built on a limited view of health that excludes the cultural knowledge of First Nations peoples. Cultural rigour is an emerging field of activity that epitomises First Nations peoples' diverse cultural knowledge through community participation in all aspects of research. Implications for public health: Critical appraisal tools developed by First Nations peoples are available to researchers and direct attention to the social, cultural, political and human rights basis of health research. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Open Access | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1111/1753-6405.13097 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1402 Applied Economics, 1605 Policy and Administration | |
dc.subject.classification | Public Health | |
dc.subject.mesh | Community Participation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cultural Characteristics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cultural Competency | |
dc.subject.mesh | Culturally Competent Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Culture | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services, Indigenous | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Status Indicators | |
dc.subject.mesh | Human Rights | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Community Participation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cultural Characteristics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cultural Competency | |
dc.subject.mesh | Culturally Competent Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Culture | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services, Indigenous | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Status Indicators | |
dc.subject.mesh | Human Rights | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Status Indicators | |
dc.subject.mesh | Culture | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cultural Characteristics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Human Rights | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services, Indigenous | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cultural Competency | |
dc.subject.mesh | Culturally Competent Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Community Participation | |
dc.title | Promoting cultural rigour through critical appraisal tools in First Nations peoples' research. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 45 | |
utslib.location.activity | Australia | |
utslib.for | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | |
utslib.for | 1402 Applied Economics | |
utslib.for | 1605 Policy and Administration | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Public Health | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
pubs.consider-herdc | false | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-02-09T02:11:19Z | |
pubs.issue | 3 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 45 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 3 |
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To highlight the emerging ethos of cultural rigour in the use of critical appraisal tools in research involving First Nations peoples. METHODS: Critical reflection on recent systematic review experience. RESULTS: The concept of cultural rigour is notably undefined in peer-reviewed journal articles but is evident in the development of critical appraisal tools developed by First Nations peoples. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional critical appraisal tools for assessing study quality are built on a limited view of health that excludes the cultural knowledge of First Nations peoples. Cultural rigour is an emerging field of activity that epitomises First Nations peoples' diverse cultural knowledge through community participation in all aspects of research. Implications for public health: Critical appraisal tools developed by First Nations peoples are available to researchers and direct attention to the social, cultural, political and human rights basis of health research.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph