Quantitative assessment of fecal contamination in multiple environmental sample types in urban communities in Dhaka, Bangladesh using SaniPath microbial approach.
Amin, N
Rahman, M
Raj, S
Ali, S
Green, J
Das, S
Doza, S
Mondol, MH
Wang, Y
Islam, MA
Alam, M-U
Huda, TMN
Haque, S
Unicomb, L
Joseph, G
Moe, CL
- Publisher:
- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- PLoS One, 2019, 14, (12), pp. e0221193
- Issue Date:
- 2019
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Amin, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Rahman, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Raj, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Green, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Das, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Doza, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Mondol, MH | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Islam, MA | |
dc.contributor.author | Alam, M-U | |
dc.contributor.author | Huda, TMN | |
dc.contributor.author | Haque, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Unicomb, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Joseph, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Moe, CL | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-14T06:53:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-19 | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-14T06:53:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS One, 2019, 14, (12), pp. e0221193 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/155209 | |
dc.description.abstract | Rapid urbanization has led to a growing sanitation crisis in urban areas of Bangladesh and potential exposure to fecal contamination in the urban environment due to inadequate sanitation and poor fecal sludge management. Limited data are available on environmental fecal contamination associated with different exposure pathways in urban Dhaka. We conducted a cross-sectional study to explore the magnitude of fecal contamination in the environment in low-income, high-income, and transient/floating neighborhoods in urban Dhaka. Ten samples were collected from each of 10 environmental compartments in 10 different neighborhoods (4 low-income, 4 high-income and 2 transient/floating neighborhoods). These 1,000 samples were analyzed with the IDEXX-Quanti-Tray technique to determine most-probable-number (MPN) of E. coli. Samples of open drains (6.91 log10 MPN/100 mL), surface water (5.28 log10 MPN/100 mL), floodwater (4.60 log10 MPN/100 mL), produce (3.19 log10 MPN/serving), soil (2.29 log10 MPN/gram), and street food (1.79 log10 MPN/gram) had the highest mean log10 E. coli contamination compared to other samples. The contamination concentrations did not differ between low-income and high-income neighborhoods for shared latrine swabs, open drains, municipal water, produce, and street foodsamples. E. coli contamination levels were significantly higher (p <0.05) in low-income neighborhoods compared to high-income for soil (0.91 log10 MPN/gram, 95% CI, 0.39, 1.43), bathing water (0.98 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 0.41, 1.54), non-municipal water (0.64 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 0.24, 1.04), surface water (1.92 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 1.44, 2.40), and floodwater (0.48 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 0.03, 0.92) samples. E. coli contamination were significantly higher (p<0.05) in low-income neighborhoods compared to transient/floating neighborhoods for drain water, bathing water, non-municipal water and surface water. Future studies should examine behavior that brings people into contact with the environment and assess the extent of exposure to fecal contamination in the environment through multiple pathways and associated risks. | |
dc.format | Electronic-eCollection | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE | |
dc.relation.ispartof | PLoS One | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1371/journal.pone.0221193 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject.classification | General Science & Technology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Bangladesh | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cross-Sectional Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Environmental Monitoring | |
dc.subject.mesh | Environmental Pollution | |
dc.subject.mesh | Escherichia coli | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feces | |
dc.subject.mesh | Food Contamination | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Poverty | |
dc.subject.mesh | Residence Characteristics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sanitation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Soil | |
dc.subject.mesh | Soil Microbiology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Urbanization | |
dc.subject.mesh | Water | |
dc.subject.mesh | Water Microbiology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feces | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Escherichia coli | |
dc.subject.mesh | Water | |
dc.subject.mesh | Soil | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cross-Sectional Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Soil Microbiology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Water Microbiology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sanitation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Environmental Pollution | |
dc.subject.mesh | Environmental Monitoring | |
dc.subject.mesh | Food Contamination | |
dc.subject.mesh | Residence Characteristics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Urbanization | |
dc.subject.mesh | Poverty | |
dc.subject.mesh | Bangladesh | |
dc.title | Quantitative assessment of fecal contamination in multiple environmental sample types in urban communities in Dhaka, Bangladesh using SaniPath microbial approach. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 14 | |
utslib.location.activity | United States | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research) | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)/Institute For Sustainable Futures | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.date.updated | 2022-03-14T06:53:54Z | |
pubs.issue | 12 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
pubs.volume | 14 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 12 |
Abstract:
Rapid urbanization has led to a growing sanitation crisis in urban areas of Bangladesh and potential exposure to fecal contamination in the urban environment due to inadequate sanitation and poor fecal sludge management. Limited data are available on environmental fecal contamination associated with different exposure pathways in urban Dhaka. We conducted a cross-sectional study to explore the magnitude of fecal contamination in the environment in low-income, high-income, and transient/floating neighborhoods in urban Dhaka. Ten samples were collected from each of 10 environmental compartments in 10 different neighborhoods (4 low-income, 4 high-income and 2 transient/floating neighborhoods). These 1,000 samples were analyzed with the IDEXX-Quanti-Tray technique to determine most-probable-number (MPN) of E. coli. Samples of open drains (6.91 log10 MPN/100 mL), surface water (5.28 log10 MPN/100 mL), floodwater (4.60 log10 MPN/100 mL), produce (3.19 log10 MPN/serving), soil (2.29 log10 MPN/gram), and street food (1.79 log10 MPN/gram) had the highest mean log10 E. coli contamination compared to other samples. The contamination concentrations did not differ between low-income and high-income neighborhoods for shared latrine swabs, open drains, municipal water, produce, and street foodsamples. E. coli contamination levels were significantly higher (p <0.05) in low-income neighborhoods compared to high-income for soil (0.91 log10 MPN/gram, 95% CI, 0.39, 1.43), bathing water (0.98 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 0.41, 1.54), non-municipal water (0.64 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 0.24, 1.04), surface water (1.92 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 1.44, 2.40), and floodwater (0.48 log10 MPN/100 mL, 95% CI, 0.03, 0.92) samples. E. coli contamination were significantly higher (p<0.05) in low-income neighborhoods compared to transient/floating neighborhoods for drain water, bathing water, non-municipal water and surface water. Future studies should examine behavior that brings people into contact with the environment and assess the extent of exposure to fecal contamination in the environment through multiple pathways and associated risks.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph