Residential Property Investment: Is Regulatory Change Neccessary

Mangioni, V

Residential Property Investment: Is Regulatory Change Neccessary

Mangioni, V

Permalink

Publisher:: Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES)
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Proceedings from the PRRES Conference - 2005, 2005, pp. 1 - 19
Issue Date:: 2005-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2005002996.pdf		769.23 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Mangioni, V https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-2171	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Reed, R	en_US
dc.date	2005-01-23	en_US
dc.date.issued	2005-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Proceedings from the PRRES Conference - 2005, 2005, pp. 1 - 19	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/1569
dc.description.abstract	Residential property investment has been incorporated into investment portfolio s and retirement plans of many Australians with increasing momentum over the past 10 years. The role of real estate agents in the marketing and sale of new residential property and the legislation governing real estate agents is now under review by both State and Commonwealth Governments. As the roles of real estate agents and investment advisers / financial planners begin to blur, the introduction of appropriate legislation governing these participants along with unlicensed marketers and seminar operators needs to be introduced. A conceptual framework has been adopted to identify the key area of the divide of independence that needs to exist between investor and marketer, be they agent, financial planner or adviser, with commentary highlighting areas of concern. The evolution and status of both State (NSW) and Commonwealth regulation governing agents and advisers / planners has been considered, with perceived concerns and gaps discussed. In conclusion, an analysis of the complaints lodged with both state and commonwealth agencies, has been reviewed, with recommendations made to address the issues raised, which are currently not dealt with, or adequately dealt with under existing regulatory provisions.	en_US
dc.publisher	Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES)	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Proceedings from the PRRES Conference - 2005	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Pacific Rim Real Estate Conference	en_US
dc.title	Residential Property Investment: Is Regulatory Change Neccessary	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location	Melbourne, Australia	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Melbourne, Australia	en_US
utslib.for	1202 Building	en_US
dc.location.activity	Melbourne, Australia	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCDP - Contemporary Design Practice
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Melbourne, Australia	en_US
pubs.start-date	2005-01-23	en_US

Abstract:

Residential property investment has been incorporated into investment portfolio s and retirement plans of many Australians with increasing momentum over the past 10 years. The role of real estate agents in the marketing and sale of new residential property and the legislation governing real estate agents is now under review by both State and Commonwealth Governments. As the roles of real estate agents and investment advisers / financial planners begin to blur, the introduction of appropriate legislation governing these participants along with unlicensed marketers and seminar operators needs to be introduced. A conceptual framework has been adopted to identify the key area of the divide of independence that needs to exist between investor and marketer, be they agent, financial planner or adviser, with commentary highlighting areas of concern. The evolution and status of both State (NSW) and Commonwealth regulation governing agents and advisers / planners has been considered, with perceived concerns and gaps discussed. In conclusion, an analysis of the complaints lodged with both state and commonwealth agencies, has been reviewed, with recommendations made to address the issues raised, which are currently not dealt with, or adequately dealt with under existing regulatory provisions.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/1569