Making A Market? Contestation And Climate Change

Pearse, B

Making A Market? Contestation And Climate Change

Pearse, B

Permalink

Publisher:: Australian Political Economy Movement
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Australian Political Economy, 2010, 12 (66), pp. 166 - 198
Issue Date:: 2010-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (507.14 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Pearse, B	en_US
dc.date.issued	2010-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Australian Political Economy, 2010, 12 (66), pp. 166 - 198	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0156-5826	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/15700
dc.description.abstract	In the last two decades political contestation over climate change generally, and climate policy specifically, has been waged over the merits, design and implementation of market-based regulatory mechanisms. This includes emissions trading, carbon taxation and various voluntary measures. Emissions trading has been at the centre of national and international debates with the provision for emissions trading and other supporting `Flexible Mechanisms in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. In turn, the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) was installed in 2005 alongside a range of smaller schemes by state and corporate enterprises mostly in OECD nations.	en_US
dc.publisher	Australian Political Economy Movement	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Australian Political Economy	en_US
dc.title	Making A Market? Contestation And Climate Change	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	66	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	12	en_US
utslib.location.activity	ISI:000288829600008	en_US
utslib.for	1499 Other Economics	en_US
utslib.for	12 Built Environment and Design	en_US
utslib.for	14 Economics	en_US
utslib.for	16 Studies in Human Society	en_US
dc.location.activity	ISI:000288829600008	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/Social and Political Sciences Program
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	66	en_US
pubs.volume	12	en_US

Abstract:

In the last two decades political contestation over climate change generally, and climate policy specifically, has been waged over the merits, design and implementation of market-based regulatory mechanisms. This includes emissions trading, carbon taxation and various voluntary measures. Emissions trading has been at the centre of national and international debates with the provision for emissions trading and other supporting `Flexible Mechanisms in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. In turn, the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) was installed in 2005 alongside a range of smaller schemes by state and corporate enterprises mostly in OECD nations.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/15700