Optima TB: A tool to help optimally allocate tuberculosis spending.
Goscé, L
Abou Jaoude, GJ
Kedziora, DJ
Benedikt, C
Hussain, A
Jarvis, S
Skrahina, A
Klimuk, D
Hurevich, H
Zhao, F
Fraser-Hurt, N
Cheikh, N
Gorgens, M
Wilson, DJ
Abeysuriya, R
Martin-Hughes, R
Kelly, SL
Roberts, A
Stuart, RM
Palmer, T
Panovska-Griffiths, J
Kerr, CC
Wilson, DP
Haghparast-Bidgoli, H
Skordis, J
Abubakar, I
- Publisher:
- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- PLoS Comput Biol, 2021, 17, (9), pp. e1009255
- Issue Date:
- 2021-09
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Goscé, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Abou Jaoude, GJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Kedziora, DJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Benedikt, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Hussain, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Jarvis, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Skrahina, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Klimuk, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Hurevich, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Fraser-Hurt, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheikh, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Gorgens, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, DJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Abeysuriya, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Martin-Hughes, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Kelly, SL | |
dc.contributor.author | Roberts, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Stuart, RM | |
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Panovska-Griffiths, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Kerr, CC | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, DP | |
dc.contributor.author | Haghparast-Bidgoli, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Skordis, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Abubakar, I | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-19T03:39:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-07 | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-19T03:39:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS Comput Biol, 2021, 17, (9), pp. e1009255 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-734X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-7358 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/157523 | |
dc.description.abstract | Approximately 85% of tuberculosis (TB) related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries where health resources are scarce. Effective priority setting is required to maximise the impact of limited budgets. The Optima TB tool has been developed to support analytical capacity and inform evidence-based priority setting processes for TB health benefits package design. This paper outlines the Optima TB framework and how it was applied in Belarus, an upper-middle income country in Eastern Europe with a relatively high burden of TB. Optima TB is a population-based disease transmission model, with programmatic cost functions and an optimisation algorithm. Modelled populations include age-differentiated general populations and higher-risk populations such as people living with HIV. Populations and prospective interventions are defined in consultation with local stakeholders. In partnership with the latter, demographic, epidemiological, programmatic, as well as cost and spending data for these populations and interventions are then collated. An optimisation analysis of TB spending was conducted in Belarus, using program objectives and constraints defined in collaboration with local stakeholders, which included experts, decision makers, funders and organisations involved in service delivery, support and technical assistance. These analyses show that it is possible to improve health impact by redistributing current TB spending in Belarus. Specifically, shifting funding from inpatient- to outpatient-focused care models, and from mass screening to active case finding strategies, could reduce TB prevalence and mortality by up to 45% and 50%, respectively, by 2035. In addition, an optimised allocation of TB spending could lead to a reduction in drug-resistant TB infections by 40% over this period. This would support progress towards national TB targets without additional financial resources. The case study in Belarus demonstrates how reallocations of spending across existing and new interventions could have a substantial impact on TB outcomes. This highlights the potential for Optima TB and similar modelling tools to support evidence-based priority setting. | |
dc.format | Electronic-eCollection | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE | |
dc.relation.ispartof | PLoS Comput Biol | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009255 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 01 Mathematical Sciences, 06 Biological Sciences, 08 Information and Computing Sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | Bioinformatics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | |
dc.subject.mesh | Algorithms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, Preschool | |
dc.subject.mesh | Computational Biology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cost-Benefit Analysis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Care Costs | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Infant | |
dc.subject.mesh | Infant, Newborn | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Models, Biological | |
dc.subject.mesh | Models, Economic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prevalence | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Republic of Belarus | |
dc.subject.mesh | Resource Allocation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Software | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tuberculosis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Young Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tuberculosis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prevalence | |
dc.subject.mesh | Models, Economic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Computational Biology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Algorithms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Models, Biological | |
dc.subject.mesh | Resource Allocation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Software | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, Preschool | |
dc.subject.mesh | Infant | |
dc.subject.mesh | Infant, Newborn | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cost-Benefit Analysis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Care Costs | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Young Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Republic of Belarus | |
dc.title | Optima TB: A tool to help optimally allocate tuberculosis spending. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 17 | |
utslib.location.activity | United States | |
utslib.for | 01 Mathematical Sciences | |
utslib.for | 06 Biological Sciences | |
utslib.for | 08 Information and Computing Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Strength - AAI - Advanced Analytics Institute Research Centre | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.date.updated | 2022-05-19T03:39:01Z | |
pubs.issue | 9 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
pubs.volume | 17 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 9 |
Abstract:
Approximately 85% of tuberculosis (TB) related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries where health resources are scarce. Effective priority setting is required to maximise the impact of limited budgets. The Optima TB tool has been developed to support analytical capacity and inform evidence-based priority setting processes for TB health benefits package design. This paper outlines the Optima TB framework and how it was applied in Belarus, an upper-middle income country in Eastern Europe with a relatively high burden of TB. Optima TB is a population-based disease transmission model, with programmatic cost functions and an optimisation algorithm. Modelled populations include age-differentiated general populations and higher-risk populations such as people living with HIV. Populations and prospective interventions are defined in consultation with local stakeholders. In partnership with the latter, demographic, epidemiological, programmatic, as well as cost and spending data for these populations and interventions are then collated. An optimisation analysis of TB spending was conducted in Belarus, using program objectives and constraints defined in collaboration with local stakeholders, which included experts, decision makers, funders and organisations involved in service delivery, support and technical assistance. These analyses show that it is possible to improve health impact by redistributing current TB spending in Belarus. Specifically, shifting funding from inpatient- to outpatient-focused care models, and from mass screening to active case finding strategies, could reduce TB prevalence and mortality by up to 45% and 50%, respectively, by 2035. In addition, an optimised allocation of TB spending could lead to a reduction in drug-resistant TB infections by 40% over this period. This would support progress towards national TB targets without additional financial resources. The case study in Belarus demonstrates how reallocations of spending across existing and new interventions could have a substantial impact on TB outcomes. This highlights the potential for Optima TB and similar modelling tools to support evidence-based priority setting.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph