Re-envisioning organizational complexity using a multiple perspectives model

Yoo, CB

Re-envisioning organizational complexity using a multiple perspectives model

Yoo, CB

Permalink

Publisher:: Cambridge University Press
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Management and Organization, 2021, 27, pp. 751-767
Issue Date:: 2021-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	re-envisioning-organizational-complexity-using-a-multiple-perspectives-model.pdf		523.76 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Yoo, CB
dc.date.accessioned	2022-05-23T00:41:17Z
dc.date.available	2022-05-23T00:41:17Z
dc.date.issued	2021-01-01
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Management and Organization, 2021, 27, pp. 751-767
dc.identifier.issn	1833-3672
dc.identifier.issn	1839-3527
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/157611
dc.description.abstract	Organizations are now more complex and require collaboration to function effectively across multiple stakeholders. Consequently, they need to be familiar with collaborative projects and participate consciously in shared processes for the accomplishment of particular goals. In order to support and strengthen business partnerships, organizations could use a model based on a multi-perspective approach, as a way of visualizing effective decision-making processes and gaining an understanding regarding how they can establish and maintain stable relationships with other organizations and strategic alliances. The benefits of the new multi-perspective model could be utilized for the collaboration of multiple stakeholders and to drive future organizational change. This study presents a case study which explores the use of a multiple perspective framework in Australian Government Organizations. The results from this study suggest that a multi-perspective model may be used to address organizational complexity through the holistic integration of stakeholder perspectives and sustained knowledge flow.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Management and Organization
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1017/jmo.2020.39
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1303 Specialist Studies in Education, 1503 Business and Management, 1505 Marketing
dc.title	Re-envisioning organizational complexity using a multiple perspectives model
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	27
utslib.for	1303 Specialist Studies in Education
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management
utslib.for	1505 Marketing
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	false
dc.date.updated	2022-05-23T00:41:16Z
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	27

Abstract:

Organizations are now more complex and require collaboration to function effectively across multiple stakeholders. Consequently, they need to be familiar with collaborative projects and participate consciously in shared processes for the accomplishment of particular goals. In order to support and strengthen business partnerships, organizations could use a model based on a multi-perspective approach, as a way of visualizing effective decision-making processes and gaining an understanding regarding how they can establish and maintain stable relationships with other organizations and strategic alliances. The benefits of the new multi-perspective model could be utilized for the collaboration of multiple stakeholders and to drive future organizational change. This study presents a case study which explores the use of a multiple perspective framework in Australian Government Organizations. The results from this study suggest that a multi-perspective model may be used to address organizational complexity through the holistic integration of stakeholder perspectives and sustained knowledge flow.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/157611