A scoping review to understand "leadership" in interprofessional education and practice.

Brewer, ML; Flavell, HL; Trede, F; Smith, M

A scoping review to understand "leadership" in interprofessional education and practice.

Brewer, ML Flavell, HL Trede, F

Smith, M

Permalink

Publisher:: TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: J Interprof Care, 2016, 30, (4), pp. 408-415
Issue Date:: 2016-07

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	A scoping review to understand leadership in interprofessional education and practice.pdf	Published version	999.47 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Brewer, ML
dc.contributor.author	Flavell, HL
dc.contributor.author	Trede, F https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-2609
dc.contributor.author	Smith, M
dc.date.accessioned	2022-07-20T05:32:04Z
dc.date.available	2022-07-20T05:32:04Z
dc.date.issued	2016-07
dc.identifier.citation	J Interprof Care, 2016, 30, (4), pp. 408-415
dc.identifier.issn	1356-1820
dc.identifier.issn	1469-9567
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/159065
dc.description.abstract	This scoping study examined how "leadership" is referred to and used in interprofessional education and practice. A total of 114 refereed articles were reviewed to determine how leadership is defined, conceptualised, and theorised. The review also examined what capabilities were identified for effective interprofessional leadership. The majority of papers were empirical studies undertaken by researchers based in North America. The majority of articles did not refer to a specific leadership approach, nor did they define, describe, or theorise leadership. Moreover, "leadership" capabilities were rarely identified. Articles generally focused on health practitioners and educators or students as leaders with little exploration of leadership at higher levels (e.g. executive, accrediting bodies, government). This review indicates the need for a more critical examination of interprofessional leadership and the capabilities required to lead the changes required in both education and practice settings. The goal of this article is to stimulate discussion and more sophisticated, shared understandings of interprofessional leadership for the professions. Recommendations for future research are required in both education and practice settings.
dc.format	Print-Electronic
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
dc.relation.ispartof	J Interprof Care
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.3109/13561820.2016.1150260
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subject.classification	Nursing
dc.subject.mesh	Health Personnel
dc.subject.mesh	Interdisciplinary Communication
dc.subject.mesh	Leadership
dc.subject.mesh	Interdisciplinary Communication
dc.subject.mesh	Leadership
dc.subject.mesh	Health Personnel
dc.title	A scoping review to understand "leadership" in interprofessional education and practice.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	30
utslib.location.activity	England
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Teaching and Learning)
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2022-07-20T05:32:03Z
pubs.issue	4
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	30
utslib.citation.issue	4

Abstract:

This scoping study examined how "leadership" is referred to and used in interprofessional education and practice. A total of 114 refereed articles were reviewed to determine how leadership is defined, conceptualised, and theorised. The review also examined what capabilities were identified for effective interprofessional leadership. The majority of papers were empirical studies undertaken by researchers based in North America. The majority of articles did not refer to a specific leadership approach, nor did they define, describe, or theorise leadership. Moreover, "leadership" capabilities were rarely identified. Articles generally focused on health practitioners and educators or students as leaders with little exploration of leadership at higher levels (e.g. executive, accrediting bodies, government). This review indicates the need for a more critical examination of interprofessional leadership and the capabilities required to lead the changes required in both education and practice settings. The goal of this article is to stimulate discussion and more sophisticated, shared understandings of interprofessional leadership for the professions. Recommendations for future research are required in both education and practice settings.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/159065