Precision of cement hydration heat models in capturing the effects of SCMs and retarders
- Publisher:
- ICE PUBLISHING
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Magazine of Concrete Research, 2018, 70, (23), pp. 1217-1231
- Issue Date:
- 2018-12-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jmacr.17.00228.pdf | Published version | 1.13 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
A major input to numerical simulation models used to predict the risk of early-age thermal cracking in concrete is the hydration heat estimation. The precision of hydration heat estimation models has been extensively verified for different cement compositions in previous studies. However, little has been done to investigate the accuracy of such models for concrete mixes containing supplementary cementitious materials and retarders. This paper presents the results of a series of isothermal calorimetry tests conducted first to investigate the effects of Class F fly ash, groundgranulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) and three commonly used retarders (namely, retarder N, sucrose and citrate) on the heat of hydration profile of Australian general-purpose cement under different curing temperatures of 10, 23 and 30°C, and second to evaluate the precision of the two most commonly used hydration heat models in capturing the effects of fly ash, GGBFS, retarders and curing temperature on the hydration profile. The results reveal the possibility of considerable errors in estimating the hydration heat of concrete mixes containing supplementary cementitious materials and retarders under different curing temperatures, highlighting the need for re-calibration of the existing models for locally used materials to avoid misleading errors in numerical simulation of early-age thermal cracking.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: