'Anyone can edit', not everyone does: Wikipedia's infrastructure and the gender gap.
- Publisher:
- SAGE Publications
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Social Studies of Science, 2017, 47, (4), pp. 511-527
- Issue Date:
- 2017-08
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0306312717692172.pdf | 93.7 kB | Adobe PDF |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author |
Ford, H https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3500-9772 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Wajcman, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-30T00:43:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-30T00:43:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Social Studies of Science, 2017, 47, (4), pp. 511-527 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0306-3127 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1460-3659 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/161077 | |
dc.description.abstract | Feminist STS has long established that science's provenance as a male domain continues to define what counts as knowledge and expertise. Wikipedia, arguably one of the most powerful sources of information today, was initially lauded as providing the opportunity to rebuild knowledge institutions by providing greater representation of multiple groups. However, less than ten percent of Wikipedia editors are women. At one level, this imbalance in contributions and therefore content is yet another case of the masculine culture of technoscience. This is an important argument and, in this article, we examine the empirical research that highlights these issues. Our main objective, however, is to extend current accounts by demonstrating that Wikipedia's infrastructure introduces new and less visible sources of gender disparity. In sum, our aim here is to present a consolidated analysis of the gendering of Wikipedia. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Social Studies of Science | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1177/0306312717692172 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | 1608 Sociology, 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields | |
dc.subject.classification | Science Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Encyclopedias as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feminism | |
dc.subject.mesh | Gender Identity | |
dc.subject.mesh | History, 20th Century | |
dc.subject.mesh | History, 21st Century | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Internet | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sex Factors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Encyclopedias as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feminism | |
dc.subject.mesh | Gender Identity | |
dc.subject.mesh | History, 20th Century | |
dc.subject.mesh | History, 21st Century | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Internet | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sex Factors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Gender Identity | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sex Factors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feminism | |
dc.subject.mesh | History, 20th Century | |
dc.subject.mesh | History, 21st Century | |
dc.subject.mesh | Internet | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Encyclopedias as Topic | |
dc.title | 'Anyone can edit', not everyone does: Wikipedia's infrastructure and the gender gap. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 47 | |
utslib.location.activity | United States | |
utslib.for | 1608 Sociology | |
utslib.for | 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences | |
utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
pubs.consider-herdc | false | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-08-30T00:43:36Z | |
pubs.issue | 4 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 47 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 4 |
Abstract:
Feminist STS has long established that science's provenance as a male domain continues to define what counts as knowledge and expertise. Wikipedia, arguably one of the most powerful sources of information today, was initially lauded as providing the opportunity to rebuild knowledge institutions by providing greater representation of multiple groups. However, less than ten percent of Wikipedia editors are women. At one level, this imbalance in contributions and therefore content is yet another case of the masculine culture of technoscience. This is an important argument and, in this article, we examine the empirical research that highlights these issues. Our main objective, however, is to extend current accounts by demonstrating that Wikipedia's infrastructure introduces new and less visible sources of gender disparity. In sum, our aim here is to present a consolidated analysis of the gendering of Wikipedia.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph