An agent for ecological deliberation

Debenham, J; Sierra, C

An agent for ecological deliberation

Debenham, J Sierra, C

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2010, 6276 LNAI (PART 1), pp. 220 - 229
Issue Date:: 2010-11-23

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2009007275OK.pdf		458.25 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Debenham, J	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Sierra, C https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-6233	en_US
dc.date.issued	2010-11-23	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2010, 6276 LNAI (PART 1), pp. 220 - 229	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	3642153860	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9783642153860	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0302-9743	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16192
dc.description.abstract	An agent architecture supports the two forms of deliberation used by human agents. Cartesian, constructivist rationalism leads to game theory, decision theory and logical models. Ecological rationalism leads to deliberative actions that are derived from agents' prior interactions and are not designed; i.e., they are strictly emergent. This paper aims to address the scant attention paid by the agent community to the predominant form of deliberation used by mankind. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-3-642-15387-7_26	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Artificial Intelligence & Image Processing	en_US
dc.title	An agent for ecological deliberation	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	PART 1	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	6276 LNAI	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
dc.location.activity	Cardiff, UK	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - AAI - Advanced Analytics Institute Research Centre
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	PART 1	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	6276 LNAI	en_US

Abstract:

An agent architecture supports the two forms of deliberation used by human agents. Cartesian, constructivist rationalism leads to game theory, decision theory and logical models. Ecological rationalism leads to deliberative actions that are derived from agents' prior interactions and are not designed; i.e., they are strictly emergent. This paper aims to address the scant attention paid by the agent community to the predominant form of deliberation used by mankind. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16192