International prevalence of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Steel, A
Redmond, R
Schloss, J
Cramer, H
Goldenberg, J
Leach, MJ
Harnett, JE
Van de Venter, C
McLintock, A
Bradley, R
Hawrelak, J
Cooley, K
Leung, B
Adams, J
Wardle, J
- Publisher:
- BMJ Journals
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- BMJ Open, 2022, 12, (7), pp. 1-12
- Issue Date:
- 2022-07-25
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author |
Steel, A https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6643-9444 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Redmond, R | |
dc.contributor.author |
Schloss, J https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-6215 |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Cramer, H https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-8046 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Goldenberg, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Leach, MJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Harnett, JE | |
dc.contributor.author | Van de Venter, C | |
dc.contributor.author | McLintock, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Bradley, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Hawrelak, J | |
dc.contributor.author |
Cooley, K https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7960-6504 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Leung, B | |
dc.contributor.author |
Adams, J https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-5717 |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wardle, J https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-3542 |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-05T03:59:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-05T03:59:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | BMJ Open, 2022, 12, (7), pp. 1-12 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/162318 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: Naturopathy is a traditional medicine system informed by codified philosophies and principles, and an emphasis on non-pharmacologic therapeutic interventions. While naturopathy is practised by approximately 75 000-100 000 000 naturopathic practitioners in at least 98 countries, little is known about the international prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies describing the global prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population. SETTING: The included literature was identified through a systematic search of eight databases between September and October 2019, as well as the grey literature. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were included if they reported the prevalence rate of consultations with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population. INTERVENTIONS: Survey items needed to report consultations with a naturopathic practitioner as defined in the country where data was collected, and not combine naturopathic consultations with other health services or only report consulations for illness populations. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary measures used for the analysis was consultations in the previous 12 months. Other prevalence timeframes were reported as secondary measures. METHODS: Meta-analysis of prevalence data was conducted using random effects models based on individual countries and WHO world regions. RESULTS: The literature search identified eight manuscripts summarising 14 studies reporting prevalence for inclusion in the review. All included studies had a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the included studies by world region found the 12-month prevalence of history of naturopathy consultations ranged from 1% in the Region of the Americas to 6% in the European and Western Pacific Regions. CONCLUSIONS: There are up to sixfold differences in the prevalence of naturopathy consults over 12 months between and within world regions, which may be driven by a range of policy, legislative and social factors. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020145529. | |
dc.format | Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | BMJ Journals | |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMJ Open | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056075 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Naturopathy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prevalence | |
dc.subject.mesh | Referral and Consultation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Naturopathy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prevalence | |
dc.subject.mesh | Referral and Consultation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Naturopathy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prevalence | |
dc.subject.mesh | Referral and Consultation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
dc.title | International prevalence of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 12 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 1103 Clinical Sciences | |
utslib.for | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | |
utslib.for | 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHSP - Health Services and Practice | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Public Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Strength - ARCCIM - Australian Research Centre in Complementary & Integrative Medicine | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
pubs.consider-herdc | false | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-10-05T03:59:20Z | |
pubs.issue | 7 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 12 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 7 |
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Naturopathy is a traditional medicine system informed by codified philosophies and principles, and an emphasis on non-pharmacologic therapeutic interventions. While naturopathy is practised by approximately 75 000-100 000 000 naturopathic practitioners in at least 98 countries, little is known about the international prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies describing the global prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population. SETTING: The included literature was identified through a systematic search of eight databases between September and October 2019, as well as the grey literature. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were included if they reported the prevalence rate of consultations with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population. INTERVENTIONS: Survey items needed to report consultations with a naturopathic practitioner as defined in the country where data was collected, and not combine naturopathic consultations with other health services or only report consulations for illness populations. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary measures used for the analysis was consultations in the previous 12 months. Other prevalence timeframes were reported as secondary measures. METHODS: Meta-analysis of prevalence data was conducted using random effects models based on individual countries and WHO world regions. RESULTS: The literature search identified eight manuscripts summarising 14 studies reporting prevalence for inclusion in the review. All included studies had a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the included studies by world region found the 12-month prevalence of history of naturopathy consultations ranged from 1% in the Region of the Americas to 6% in the European and Western Pacific Regions. CONCLUSIONS: There are up to sixfold differences in the prevalence of naturopathy consults over 12 months between and within world regions, which may be driven by a range of policy, legislative and social factors. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020145529.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph