Empirical evaluation of the agile process lifecycle management framework

Qumer, A; Henderson-Sellers, B

Empirical evaluation of the agile process lifecycle management framework

Qumer, A

Henderson-Sellers, B

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: 2010 4th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science - Proceedings, RCIS 2010, 2010, pp. 213 - 222
Issue Date:: 2010-10-07

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2009008405OK.pdf		1.11 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Qumer, A https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-6280	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Henderson-Sellers, B	en_US
dc.date.issued	2010-10-07	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	2010 4th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science - Proceedings, RCIS 2010, 2010, pp. 213 - 222	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9781424448401	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16264
dc.description.abstract	While many organisations are interested in adopting agile methods suitable to their local circumstances, there is little guidance available on how to do so. To address this important issue, we have developed an agile software process lifecycle management framework (APLM). The APLM framework is intended for use by agile coaches, managers and consultants to facilitate the integration of agile practices into both software project development environments. This paper presents the outcomes of an empirical evaluation of the APLM framework that has been conducted by involving a practitioners' group composed of fourteen experienced agile experts from industry. The main objective of this empirical study is to determine to what extent each component of the agile process lifecycle management (APLM) framework is relevant, valuable and sufficient to achieve its purpose from an industry practitioner's perspective. © 2010 IEEE.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	2010 4th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science - Proceedings, RCIS 2010	en_US
dc.title	Empirical evaluation of the agile process lifecycle management framework	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
dc.location.activity	Nice, France	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Computer Science
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - GBDTC - Global Big Data Technologies
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

While many organisations are interested in adopting agile methods suitable to their local circumstances, there is little guidance available on how to do so. To address this important issue, we have developed an agile software process lifecycle management framework (APLM). The APLM framework is intended for use by agile coaches, managers and consultants to facilitate the integration of agile practices into both software project development environments. This paper presents the outcomes of an empirical evaluation of the APLM framework that has been conducted by involving a practitioners' group composed of fourteen experienced agile experts from industry. The main objective of this empirical study is to determine to what extent each component of the agile process lifecycle management (APLM) framework is relevant, valuable and sufficient to achieve its purpose from an industry practitioner's perspective. © 2010 IEEE.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16264