A Network Recovery Strategy Scheme Based on Network Failure Scenarios and Topologies

Rafiei, A; Al Sabbagh, A

A Network Recovery Strategy Scheme Based on Network Failure Scenarios and Topologies

Rafiei, A Al Sabbagh, A

Permalink

Publisher:: IEEE
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: 2010 International Conference on Communication and Vehicular Technology (ICCVT), 2010, pp. 1 - 4
Issue Date:: 2010-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (294.07 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Rafiei, A	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Al Sabbagh, A https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-8498	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Program Committee	en_US
dc.date	2010-12-30	en_US
dc.date.issued	2010-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	2010 International Conference on Communication and Vehicular Technology (ICCVT), 2010, pp. 1 - 4	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-1-4244-9674-7	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16387
dc.description.abstract	Network failures happen frequently. There is a need for recovery mechanisms to reduce service interruption. Recovery mechanismsâ advantages and disadvantages are described extensively based on their characteristics and performances. However, it is more desirable that network recovery strategies are chosen based on failure scenarios and topologies. In this paper, we propose a recovery scheme and focus on networks whose paths and resources from source to destination nodes are computed and negotiated primarily at source nodes, Ingress Label Switched Router (LSR), which are the case for Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) networks. Choosing proper network recovery mechanisms depends on many parameters such as distance of failure from source node, degree distribution of nodes, availabilities of alternative paths, and maximum allowed-hopcount increase in alternative paths. Three recovery mechanisms: Haskin, Global and Local Protection are compared with the proposed restoration scheme. By changing parameters on appropriate ranges and by using probability of received data packet at the destination node, e.g. probability of error as one of the performance criteria, we can make a fair judgment on choosing a network strategy by considering available network parameters and topology.	en_US
dc.publisher	IEEE	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	2010 International Conference on Communication and Vehicular Technology (ICCVT)	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	International Conference on Communication and Vehicular Technology	en_US
dc.rights	© 2010 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.	en_US
dc.title	A Network Recovery Strategy Scheme Based on Network Failure Scenarios and Topologies	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location	USA	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Hanoi, Vietnam	en_US
utslib.for	0913 Mechanical Engineering	en_US
dc.location.activity	Hanoi, Vietnam	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Students
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	USA	en_US
pubs.start-date	2010-12-30	en_US

Abstract:

Network failures happen frequently. There is a need for recovery mechanisms to reduce service interruption. Recovery mechanismsâ advantages and disadvantages are described extensively based on their characteristics and performances. However, it is more desirable that network recovery strategies are chosen based on failure scenarios and topologies. In this paper, we propose a recovery scheme and focus on networks whose paths and resources from source to destination nodes are computed and negotiated primarily at source nodes, Ingress Label Switched Router (LSR), which are the case for Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) networks. Choosing proper network recovery mechanisms depends on many parameters such as distance of failure from source node, degree distribution of nodes, availabilities of alternative paths, and maximum allowed-hopcount increase in alternative paths. Three recovery mechanisms: Haskin, Global and Local Protection are compared with the proposed restoration scheme. By changing parameters on appropriate ranges and by using probability of received data packet at the destination node, e.g. probability of error as one of the performance criteria, we can make a fair judgment on choosing a network strategy by considering available network parameters and topology.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16387