Domestic and family violence behaviour change programs: An examination of Gendered and Non-Gendered Frameworks

Birch, P

Domestic and family violence behaviour change programs: An examination of Gendered and Non-Gendered Frameworks

Birch, P

Permalink

Publisher:: Community Safety Knowledge Alliance (CSKA)
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Community Safety and Well-being, 2022, 7, (2), pp. 75-80
Issue Date:: 2022

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (239.73 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Birch, P https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-5897
dc.date.accessioned	2022-12-06T00:08:18Z
dc.date.available	2022-12-06T00:08:18Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Community Safety and Well-being, 2022, 7, (2), pp. 75-80
dc.identifier.issn	2371-4298
dc.identifier.issn	2371-4298
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/164141
dc.description.abstract	This article sets out to examine the dichotomous frameworks used to inform domestic and family violence (DFV) behaviour change programs (BCPs). Based on a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) methodology, we consider what works and what does not work in the delivery of Domestic and Family Violence programs through a gendered and non-gendered framework. This methodology was selected as it supports a balanced assessment of existing published research in the area, allowing for the current knowledge base to be critically examined. As a result, the REA revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of traditional gendered approaches focusing on the Duluth Model and non-gendered therapeutic approaches focusing on Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT). Yet, while strengths and weaknesses can be seen in both the “violence as gendered” and “violence as non-gendered” paradigms, a case is made for only delivering BCPs within a non-gendered framework.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Community Safety Knowledge Alliance (CSKA)
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Community Safety and Well-being
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.35502/jcswb.240
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title	Domestic and family violence behaviour change programs: An examination of Gendered and Non-Gendered Frameworks
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	7
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/School of International Studies
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	false
dc.date.updated	2022-12-06T00:08:17Z
pubs.issue	2
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	7
utslib.citation.issue	2

Abstract:

This article sets out to examine the dichotomous frameworks used to inform domestic and family violence (DFV) behaviour change programs (BCPs). Based on a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) methodology, we consider what works and what does not work in the delivery of Domestic and Family Violence programs through a gendered and non-gendered framework. This methodology was selected as it supports a balanced assessment of existing published research in the area, allowing for the current knowledge base to be critically examined. As a result, the REA revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of traditional gendered approaches focusing on the Duluth Model and non-gendered therapeutic approaches focusing on Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT). Yet, while strengths and weaknesses can be seen in both the “violence as gendered” and “violence as non-gendered” paradigms, a case is made for only delivering BCPs within a non-gendered framework.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/164141