Restoration to practice of health practitioners removed for serious sexual misconduct: evaluating public confidence and assessing risk
- Publisher:
- Informa UK Limited
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Griffith Law Review, 2022, 31, (1), pp. 123-150
- Issue Date:
- 2022-01-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restoration to practice of health practitioners removed for serious sexual misconduct evaluating public confidence and assessing risk.pdf | Published version | 2.56 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
This article examines how the health system in Australia ensures public protection and confidence when making determinations about the reinstatement of health practitioners who have previously been deregistered for sexual misconduct. Three main issues are addressed: first, the lack of public process and accessible reasons concerning the majority of reinstatement decisions, with consequent omissions in the public record and impact upon public confidence. Second, a detailed analysis is undertaken of the limited available reinstatement decisions, to understand how legislative and jurisprudential criteria of public protection (including protecting patient safety, promoting professional standards and maintaining public confidence) are weighed against the ‘rehabilitative’ impetus within a context strongly influenced by health evidence and therapeutic considerations. Third, a call is made to develop a responsive, modern and transparent framework for understanding and assessing the impact on public confidence of disciplinary decisions concerning the reinstatement of health practitioners.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: