Conflicts of interest in divisions of general practice.

Palmer, N; Braunack-Mayer, A; Rogers, W; Provis, C; Cullity, G

Conflicts of interest in divisions of general practice.

Palmer, N

Braunack-Mayer, A Rogers, W Provis, C Cullity, G

Permalink

Publisher:: BMJ
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: J Med Ethics, 2006, 32, (12), pp. 715-717
Issue Date:: 2006-12

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	27719762.pdf	Published version	756.53 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Palmer, N https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-7177
dc.contributor.author	Braunack-Mayer, A
dc.contributor.author	Rogers, W
dc.contributor.author	Provis, C
dc.contributor.author	Cullity, G
dc.date.accessioned	2022-12-23T06:44:45Z
dc.date.available	2022-12-23T06:44:45Z
dc.date.issued	2006-12
dc.identifier.citation	J Med Ethics, 2006, 32, (12), pp. 715-717
dc.identifier.issn	0306-6800
dc.identifier.issn	1473-4257
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/164540
dc.description.abstract	Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an example, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of conflicts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed.
dc.format	Print
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	BMJ
dc.relation.ispartof	J Med Ethics
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1136/jme.2005.014811
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences, 1801 Law, 2201 Applied Ethics
dc.subject.classification	Applied Ethics
dc.subject.mesh	Australia
dc.subject.mesh	Conflict of Interest
dc.subject.mesh	Decision Making
dc.subject.mesh	Ethics, Clinical
dc.subject.mesh	Family Practice
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Physician's Role
dc.subject.mesh	Physician-Patient Relations
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Physician's Role
dc.subject.mesh	Physician-Patient Relations
dc.subject.mesh	Decision Making
dc.subject.mesh	Family Practice
dc.subject.mesh	Ethics, Clinical
dc.subject.mesh	Conflict of Interest
dc.subject.mesh	Australia
dc.title	Conflicts of interest in divisions of general practice.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	32
utslib.location.activity	England
utslib.for	1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
utslib.for	1801 Law
utslib.for	2201 Applied Ethics
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2022-12-23T06:44:43Z
pubs.issue	12
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	32
utslib.citation.issue	12

Abstract:

Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an example, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of conflicts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/164540