Challenges and opportunities in designing dementia-friendly communities with local governments

Karamacoska, D; Salunke, P; Shatnawi, E; Caballero, G; Steiner, GZ; Dadich, A; DiGiacomo, M; Morrison, N; Alliance, CBD

Challenges and opportunities in designing dementia-friendly communities with local governments

Karamacoska, D Salunke, P Shatnawi, E Caballero, G Steiner, GZ Dadich, A DiGiacomo, M

Morrison, N Alliance, CBD

Permalink

Publication Type:: Poster
Citation:: 2022
Issue Date:: 2022-12-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Alzheimer s Dementia - 2022 - Karamacoska - Challenges and opportunities in designing dementia‐friendly communities with.pdf		82.79 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Karamacoska, D
dc.contributor.author	Salunke, P
dc.contributor.author	Shatnawi, E
dc.contributor.author	Caballero, G
dc.contributor.author	Steiner, GZ
dc.contributor.author	Dadich, A
dc.contributor.author	DiGiacomo, M https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-8224
dc.contributor.author	Morrison, N
dc.contributor.author	Alliance, CBD
dc.date.accessioned	2023-01-19T03:26:29Z
dc.date.available	2023-01-19T03:26:29Z
dc.date.issued	2022-12-01
dc.identifier.citation	2022
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/165195
dc.description.abstract	Background: Communities that do not accommodate the needs and preferences of people with dementia can exacerbate disability and isolation. Although dementia-friendly communities (DFCs) were established to foster understanding and acceptance of dementia, the built environment remains underexplored. We identified the challenges and opportunities for fostering dementia-enabling environments among community planners. Method: This study is set in South-West Sydney, Australia, where a DFC is being established. The policies of seven local governments were analysed for actions that aligned with Dementia Australia’s 41 DFC recommendations: 13 for social, 14 for outdoor, and 14 for indoor environments. An online workshop was then held with 30 community planners to raise awareness for dementia-enabling environments. Participants were surveyed about their dementia beliefs and attitudes. Facilitated discussions identified challenges and opportunities for designing DFCs. Qualitative and quantitative data across all sources were triangulated. Result: Although none of the local government policies specifically mentioned dementia, up to 20/41 DFC actions were met. Most of these were in social engagement (with ≤10/13 recommendations met by each local government). Less action was taken on outdoor and indoor environments (with ≤9/14 outdoor and ≤4/14 indoor recommendations met by up to six local governments). Although beliefs and attitudes about dementia among planners were generally positive, only 48% indicated that they had a good understanding of it and nearly 80% noted they would feel anxious and depressed about a diagnosis. Key DFC challenges included a lack of awareness and conflicting priorities between government bodies. Opportunities included engaging with universities to conduct demographically relevant awareness raising, facilitate multisectoral collaboration, developing an evidence-base, and involving service providers to engage with the dementia community. Conclusion: This study triangulated data to identify gaps in community planning efforts, confirming that more action is required to design dementia-friendly communities. We are now leading a multisectoral collaboration to educate community planners and the public, and are advocating for the recognition of dementia-friendly environments in government plans. This study provides practical guidance to assist planners with DFC designs.
dc.language	en
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1103 Clinical Sciences, 1109 Neurosciences
dc.subject.classification	Geriatrics
dc.title	Challenges and opportunities in designing dementia-friendly communities with local governments
dc.type	Poster
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences
utslib.for	1109 Neurosciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/IMPACCT
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2023-01-19T03:26:28Z

Abstract:

Background: Communities that do not accommodate the needs and preferences of people with dementia can exacerbate disability and isolation. Although dementia-friendly communities (DFCs) were established to foster understanding and acceptance of dementia, the built environment remains underexplored. We identified the challenges and opportunities for fostering dementia-enabling environments among community planners. Method: This study is set in South-West Sydney, Australia, where a DFC is being established. The policies of seven local governments were analysed for actions that aligned with Dementia Australia’s 41 DFC recommendations: 13 for social, 14 for outdoor, and 14 for indoor environments. An online workshop was then held with 30 community planners to raise awareness for dementia-enabling environments. Participants were surveyed about their dementia beliefs and attitudes. Facilitated discussions identified challenges and opportunities for designing DFCs. Qualitative and quantitative data across all sources were triangulated. Result: Although none of the local government policies specifically mentioned dementia, up to 20/41 DFC actions were met. Most of these were in social engagement (with ≤10/13 recommendations met by each local government). Less action was taken on outdoor and indoor environments (with ≤9/14 outdoor and ≤4/14 indoor recommendations met by up to six local governments). Although beliefs and attitudes about dementia among planners were generally positive, only 48% indicated that they had a good understanding of it and nearly 80% noted they would feel anxious and depressed about a diagnosis. Key DFC challenges included a lack of awareness and conflicting priorities between government bodies. Opportunities included engaging with universities to conduct demographically relevant awareness raising, facilitate multisectoral collaboration, developing an evidence-base, and involving service providers to engage with the dementia community. Conclusion: This study triangulated data to identify gaps in community planning efforts, confirming that more action is required to design dementia-friendly communities. We are now leading a multisectoral collaboration to educate community planners and the public, and are advocating for the recognition of dementia-friendly environments in government plans. This study provides practical guidance to assist planners with DFC designs.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/165195