The corporate monster metaphor

Crofts, P

The corporate monster metaphor

Crofts, P

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Law Text Culture, 2022, 26, pp. 73-96
Issue Date:: 2022-12-08

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (312.63 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Crofts, P https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6018-7159
dc.date.accessioned	2023-01-20T04:18:32Z
dc.date.available	2023-01-20T04:18:32Z
dc.date.issued	2022-12-08
dc.identifier.citation	Law Text Culture, 2022, 26, pp. 73-96
dc.identifier.issn	1322-9060
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/165311
dc.description.abstract	The metaphor of corporations as monsters is a feature of academic and judicial writings. Like monsters, corporations are creatures of fiction that problematize and challenge order. Corporations do not fit neatly into common law criminal legal doctrine, which was conceived and structured around the classic legal subject, that is, the individual human being. Corporations are amoral immortals, which ‘have no conscience and feel no pain’. They have superhuman strength, growing exponentially in size and wealth in accordance with the dictates of capitalism, and are capable of doing great harms and evil. Like monsters, corporations are contaminated and contaminating; in the process of becoming legal subjects corporations have become dehumanised and dehumanising. Despite the dominance of the corporate monster metaphor, there is slippage around the conception of which type of monster best represents corporations, and this slippage has implications for how the law regards and regulates (or not) corporations. This article takes the metaphor of the corporation as monster seriously. Descriptively, this analysis asks us to think more specifically about the different metaphorical implications of different kinds of monsters. Normatively, the argument considers the implications of these distinctive framings for criminal legal understandings of the corporation. Calling corporations monsters places us within the horror genre. We therefore need to read and understand these metaphors within that genre. A central insight of the horror genre is that monsters justify and require extreme responses. Rather than stopping at the argument that corporations have no body to kick, we need to find more imaginative and specific responses to corporate crime.
dc.language	en
dc.relation	http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE180100577
dc.relation.ispartof	Law Text Culture
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	1602 Criminology, 1801 Law
dc.title	The corporate monster metaphor
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	26
utslib.for	1602 Criminology
utslib.for	1801 Law
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	true
dc.date.updated	2023-01-20T04:18:30Z
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	26

Abstract:

The metaphor of corporations as monsters is a feature of academic and judicial writings. Like monsters, corporations are creatures of fiction that problematize and challenge order. Corporations do not fit neatly into common law criminal legal doctrine, which was conceived and structured around the classic legal subject, that is, the individual human being. Corporations are amoral immortals, which ‘have no conscience and feel no pain’. They have superhuman strength, growing exponentially in size and wealth in accordance with the dictates of capitalism, and are capable of doing great harms and evil. Like monsters, corporations are contaminated and contaminating; in the process of becoming legal subjects corporations have become dehumanised and dehumanising. Despite the dominance of the corporate monster metaphor, there is slippage around the conception of which type of monster best represents corporations, and this slippage has implications for how the law regards and regulates (or not) corporations. This article takes the metaphor of the corporation as monster seriously. Descriptively, this analysis asks us to think more specifically about the different metaphorical implications of different kinds of monsters. Normatively, the argument considers the implications of these distinctive framings for criminal legal understandings of the corporation. Calling corporations monsters places us within the horror genre. We therefore need to read and understand these metaphors within that genre. A central insight of the horror genre is that monsters justify and require extreme responses. Rather than stopping at the argument that corporations have no body to kick, we need to find more imaginative and specific responses to corporate crime.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/165311