The science of clinical quality registries.

Parker, KJ; Hickman, LD; Ferguson, C

The science of clinical quality registries.

Parker, KJ Hickman, LD Ferguson, C

Permalink

Publisher:: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2023, 22, (2), pp. 220-225
Issue Date:: 2023-03-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (647.63 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Parker, KJ
dc.contributor.author	Hickman, LD
dc.contributor.author	Ferguson, C https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-2216
dc.date.accessioned	2023-09-15T05:04:01Z
dc.date.available	2022-12-31
dc.date.available	2023-09-15T05:04:01Z
dc.date.issued	2023-03-01
dc.identifier.citation	Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2023, 22, (2), pp. 220-225
dc.identifier.issn	1474-5151
dc.identifier.issn	1873-1953
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/172123
dc.description.abstract	Clinical quality registries can be a transformational tool to improve healthcare delivery. Clinical registries with an incorporated quality emphasis identify evidence-practice gaps, inform quality improvement, and provide foundational research data to examine and improve health-related outcomes. For registries to create an impact it is essential that clinicians and researchers understand historical context, importance, advantages, and key criticisms. This methodological paper highlights the skills and capabilities required to build and maintain a robust clinical quality registry. This includes key measures to ensure data security, quality control, ongoing operational components, and benchmarking of care outcomes.
dc.format	Print
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	Oxford University Press (OUP)
dc.relation.ispartof	Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1093/eurjcn/zvad008
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, 1110 Nursing, 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subject.classification	Nursing
dc.subject.classification	3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
dc.subject.classification	4205 Nursing
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Benchmarking
dc.subject.mesh	Delivery of Health Care
dc.subject.mesh	Quality Improvement
dc.subject.mesh	Registries
dc.subject.mesh	Evidence Gaps
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Registries
dc.subject.mesh	Benchmarking
dc.subject.mesh	Delivery of Health Care
dc.subject.mesh	Quality Improvement
dc.subject.mesh	Evidence Gaps
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Benchmarking
dc.subject.mesh	Delivery of Health Care
dc.subject.mesh	Quality Improvement
dc.subject.mesh	Registries
dc.subject.mesh	Evidence Gaps
dc.title	The science of clinical quality registries.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	22
utslib.location.activity	England
utslib.for	1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
utslib.for	1110 Nursing
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHSP - Health Services and Practice
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/IMPACCT
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
dc.date.updated	2023-09-15T05:04:00Z
pubs.issue	2
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	22
utslib.citation.issue	2

Abstract:

Clinical quality registries can be a transformational tool to improve healthcare delivery. Clinical registries with an incorporated quality emphasis identify evidence-practice gaps, inform quality improvement, and provide foundational research data to examine and improve health-related outcomes. For registries to create an impact it is essential that clinicians and researchers understand historical context, importance, advantages, and key criticisms. This methodological paper highlights the skills and capabilities required to build and maintain a robust clinical quality registry. This includes key measures to ensure data security, quality control, ongoing operational components, and benchmarking of care outcomes.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/172123