Strengthening open disclosure after incidents in maternity care: a realist synthesis of international research evidence.
- Publisher:
- BMC
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- BMC Health Serv Res, 2023, 23, (1), pp. 285
- Issue Date:
- 2023-03-27
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Adams, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Hartley, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanford, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Heazell, AE | |
dc.contributor.author | Iedema, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Bevan, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Booker, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Treadwell, M | |
dc.contributor.author |
Sandall, J https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-743X |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-04T03:05:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-04 | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-04T03:05:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Health Serv Res, 2023, 23, (1), pp. 285 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/172462 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Open Disclosure (OD) is open and timely communication about harmful events arising from health care with those affected. It is an entitlement of service-users and an aspect of their recovery, as well as an important dimension of service safety improvement. Recently, OD in maternity care in the English National Health Service has become a pressing public issue, with policymakers promoting multiple interventions to manage the financial and reputational costs of communication failures. There is limited research to understand how OD works and its effects in different contexts. METHODS: Realist literature screening, data extraction, and retroductive theorisation involving two advisory stakeholder groups. Data relevant to families, clinicians, and services were mapped to theorise the relationships between contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes. From these maps, key aspects for successful OD were identified. RESULTS: After realist quality appraisal, 38 documents were included in the synthesis (22 academic, 2 training guidance, and 14 policy report). 135 explanatory accounts were identified from the included documents (with n = 41 relevant to families; n = 37 relevant to staff; and n = 37 relevant to services). These were theorised as five key mechanism sets: (a) meaningful acknowledgement of harm, (b) opportunity for family involvement in reviews and investigations, (c) possibilities for families and staff to make sense of what happened, (d) specialist skills and psychological safety of clinicians, and (e) families and staff knowing that improvements are happening. Three key contextual factors were identified: (a) the configuration of the incident (how and when identified and classified as more or less severe); (b) national or state drivers, such as polices, regulations, and schemes, designed to promote OD; and (c) the organisational context within which these these drivers are recieived and negotiated. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review to theorise how OD works, for whom, in what circumstances, and why. We identify and examine from the secondary data the five key mechanisms for successful OD and the three contextual factors that influence this. The next study stage will use interview and ethnographic data to test, deepen, or overturn our five hypothesised programme theories to explain what is required to strengthen OD in maternity services. | |
dc.format | Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | BMC | |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Health Serv Res | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1186/s12913-023-09033-2 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. | |
dc.subject | 0807 Library and Information Studies, 1110 Nursing, 1117 Public Health and Health Services | |
dc.subject.classification | Health Policy & Services | |
dc.subject.classification | 4203 Health services and systems | |
dc.subject.classification | 4205 Nursing | |
dc.subject.classification | 4206 Public health | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Disclosure | |
dc.subject.mesh | State Medicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Maternal Health Services | |
dc.subject.mesh | Delivery of Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Communication | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Communication | |
dc.subject.mesh | Disclosure | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Maternal Health Services | |
dc.subject.mesh | State Medicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Delivery of Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Disclosure | |
dc.subject.mesh | State Medicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Maternal Health Services | |
dc.subject.mesh | Delivery of Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Communication | |
dc.title | Strengthening open disclosure after incidents in maternity care: a realist synthesis of international research evidence. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 23 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 0807 Library and Information Studies | |
utslib.for | 1110 Nursing | |
utslib.for | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Midwifery | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.date.updated | 2023-10-04T03:05:41Z | |
pubs.issue | 1 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
pubs.volume | 23 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 1 |
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Open Disclosure (OD) is open and timely communication about harmful events arising from health care with those affected. It is an entitlement of service-users and an aspect of their recovery, as well as an important dimension of service safety improvement. Recently, OD in maternity care in the English National Health Service has become a pressing public issue, with policymakers promoting multiple interventions to manage the financial and reputational costs of communication failures. There is limited research to understand how OD works and its effects in different contexts. METHODS: Realist literature screening, data extraction, and retroductive theorisation involving two advisory stakeholder groups. Data relevant to families, clinicians, and services were mapped to theorise the relationships between contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes. From these maps, key aspects for successful OD were identified. RESULTS: After realist quality appraisal, 38 documents were included in the synthesis (22 academic, 2 training guidance, and 14 policy report). 135 explanatory accounts were identified from the included documents (with n = 41 relevant to families; n = 37 relevant to staff; and n = 37 relevant to services). These were theorised as five key mechanism sets: (a) meaningful acknowledgement of harm, (b) opportunity for family involvement in reviews and investigations, (c) possibilities for families and staff to make sense of what happened, (d) specialist skills and psychological safety of clinicians, and (e) families and staff knowing that improvements are happening. Three key contextual factors were identified: (a) the configuration of the incident (how and when identified and classified as more or less severe); (b) national or state drivers, such as polices, regulations, and schemes, designed to promote OD; and (c) the organisational context within which these these drivers are recieived and negotiated. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review to theorise how OD works, for whom, in what circumstances, and why. We identify and examine from the secondary data the five key mechanisms for successful OD and the three contextual factors that influence this. The next study stage will use interview and ethnographic data to test, deepen, or overturn our five hypothesised programme theories to explain what is required to strengthen OD in maternity services.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph