Ions play different roles in virus removal caused by different NOMs in UF process: Removal efficiency and mechanism analysis.
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Chemosphere, 2023, 313, pp. 137644
- Issue Date:
- 2023-02
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ions play different roles in virus removal caused by different NOMs in UF process Removal efficiency and mechanism analysis.pdf | Published version | 2.8 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
In this study, we investigated the effect of different compositions of aquatic natural organic matter (NOM) and ions on virus removal by ultrafiltration (UF). MS2 bacteriophage was used as a surrogate. Humic acid (HA) improved the MS2 removal rate from 1.95 ± 0.09 LRV to 2.40 ± 0.03 LRV at the HA dosage of 9 mg/L through the combined mechanisms of size exclusion, electrostatic repulsion and hydrophobicity. MS2 removal rate further increased to 3.10 ± 0.05 LRV by 10 mmol/L Na+ dosage and 3.19 ± 0.12 LRV by Ca2+ 1 mmol/L in the HA-containing UF system. Size exclusion turned into the dominant virus removal mechanism according to the results of the fouling model fitting and the weakening of electrostatic repulsion and hydrophobicity. The complexation of Ca2+ also played a role in MS2 removal based on the analysis of interaction force. MS2 removal rate by bovine serum albumin (BSA) was poor, which was 2.07 ± 0.06 LRV at the BSA dosage of 9 mg/L. Hydrophobicity was greatly reduced and the dominant virus removal mechanisms were size exclusion and electrostatic repulsion. 10 mmol/L Na+ in the presence of BSA deteriorated MS2 removal rate to 2.02 ± 0.07 LRV by the weakening of electrostatic repulsion, hydrophobicity and size exclusion. Electrostatic repulsion severely decreased by 1 mmol/L Ca2+ and the enhanced adsorption barrier represented competitive adsorption of Ca2+ by BSA and MS2 contributed for MS2 removal further decline (1.99 ± 0.05 LRV). Complex components in water will have different effects on virus removal due to their properties and interactions. This study can provide references for selecting more efficient water treatment methods according to the different compositions of raw water in actual water treatment applications during the UF process. Moreover, the retention of virus by UF can be predicted based on our study results.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: