Uses and abuses of the stereotype mechanism in UML 1.x and 2.0

Publication Type:
Conference Proceeding
Citation:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2006, 4199 LNCS pp. 16 - 26
Issue Date:
2006-01-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2006004151.pdf930.26 kB
Adobe PDF
Stereotypes were introduced into the UML in order to offer extensibility to the basic metamodel structure by the user and without actually modifying the metamodel. In UML version 1.x, this was accomplished by means of permitting virtual subtyping in the metamodel. However, this facility led many to misuse stereotypes, particularly in places where regular domain-level model-ling would be more appropriate. In version 2.0 of the UML, the portion of the metamodel pertaining to stereotypes was drastically revised. The resulting mechanism is reviewed here and compared with that of version 1.x. From a set theory point of view, the new (2.0) metamodel is unfortunately untenable and the examples used in the OMG documentation unconvincing. This paper out-lines the issues and suggests some possible steps to improve the UML 2.0 stereotype theory and practice. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: