Automated mental arithmetic performance detection using quantum pattern- and triangle pooling techniques with EEG signals
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 227, pp. 120306
- Issue Date:
- 2023-10-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automated mental arithmetic performance detection using quantum pattern- and triangle pooling techniques with EEG signals.pdf | Published version | 3.12 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Background: Electroencephalography (EEG) signals recorded during mental arithmetic tasks can be used to quantify mental performance. The classification of these input EEG signals can be automated using machine learning models. We aimed to develop an efficient handcrafted model that could accurately discriminate “bad counters” vs. “good counters” in mental arithmetic. Materials and method: We studied a public mental arithmetic task performance EEG dataset comprising 20-channel EEG signal segments recorded from 36 healthy right-handed subjects divided into two classes 10 “bad counters” and 26 “good counters”. The original 60-second EEG samples are divided into 424 15-second segments (119 and 305 belonging to the “bad counters” and “good counters”, respectively) to input into our model. Our model comprised a novel multilevel feature extraction method based on (1) four rhombuses lattice pattern, a new generation function for feature extraction that was inspired by the lattice structure in post-quantum cryptography; and (2) triangle pooling, a new distance-based pooling function for signal decomposition. These were combined with downstream feature selection using iterative neighborhood component analysis, channel-wise result classification using support vector machine with leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) and 10-fold) cross-validations (CVs) to calculate prediction vectors, iterative majority voting to generate voted vectors, and greedy algorithm to obtain the best results. Results: The model attained 88.44% and 96.42% geometric means and accuracies of 93.40% and 97.88%, using LOSO and 10-fold CVs, respectively. Conclusions: Our model's >93% classification accuracies compared favorably against published literature. Importantly, the model has linear computational complexity, which enhances its ease of implementation.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: