Comparison Analysis of Doubly Salient Permanent Magnet Machine

Guo, K; Liu, C; Li, C; Guo, Y

Comparison Analysis of Doubly Salient Permanent Magnet Machine

Guo, K Liu, C Li, C Guo, Y

Permalink

Publisher:: IEEE
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Applied Superconductivity and Electromagnetic Devices (ASEMD), 2024, 00, pp. 1-2
Issue Date:: 2024-01-09

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	1694713.pdf	Published version	1.08 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Guo, K
dc.contributor.author	Liu, C
dc.contributor.author	Li, C
dc.contributor.author	Guo, Y https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6182-0684
dc.date	2023-10-27
dc.date.accessioned	2024-05-13T01:42:49Z
dc.date.available	2024-05-13T01:42:49Z
dc.date.issued	2024-01-09
dc.identifier.citation	2023 IEEE International Conference on Applied Superconductivity and Electromagnetic Devices (ASEMD), 2024, 00, pp. 1-2
dc.identifier.isbn	9798350301571
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/178870
dc.description.abstract	The design of two doubly salient DS machines with permanent magnet PM material placed in the stator yoke is calculated by generic algorithm from the perspective of pole slot combination flux concentrated effect and flux barrier effect which can consider the local magnetic saturation The electromagnetic characteristics of DSPM are analyzed by finite element method When the topologies I and II have different motor volumes the same winding numbers and PM material quantities the maximum value of back electromotive force EMF and torque of topology II are larger by 22 27 and 12 02 than those of topology I respectively The torque ripple of topology II is lower by 41 than that of topology I When the topologies I and II have the same motor volumes winding numbers and PM material quantities the maximum value of back EMF and torque of topology I are larger by 22 73 and 29 18 than those of topology II respectively The torque ripple of topology II is lower by 50 than that of topology I
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	IEEE
dc.relation.ispartof	2023 IEEE International Conference on Applied Superconductivity and Electromagnetic Devices (ASEMD)
dc.relation.ispartof	2023 IEEE International Conference on Applied Superconductivity and Electromagnetic Devices
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1109/asemd59061.2023.10369503
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title	Comparison Analysis of Doubly Salient Permanent Magnet Machine
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	00
utslib.location.activity	Tianjin, China
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Electrical and Data Engineering
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2024-05-13T01:42:47Z
pubs.finish-date	2023-10-29
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.start-date	2023-10-27
pubs.volume	00

Abstract:

The design of two doubly salient DS machines with permanent magnet PM material placed in the stator yoke is calculated by generic algorithm from the perspective of pole slot combination flux concentrated effect and flux barrier effect which can consider the local magnetic saturation The electromagnetic characteristics of DSPM are analyzed by finite element method When the topologies I and II have different motor volumes the same winding numbers and PM material quantities the maximum value of back electromotive force EMF and torque of topology II are larger by 22 27 and 12 02 than those of topology I respectively The torque ripple of topology II is lower by 41 than that of topology I When the topologies I and II have the same motor volumes winding numbers and PM material quantities the maximum value of back EMF and torque of topology I are larger by 22 73 and 29 18 than those of topology II respectively The torque ripple of topology II is lower by 50 than that of topology I

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/178870