Questionnaires assessing knowledge and beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions are potentially suitable for use, but further research is needed: a systematic review.

Corrêa, LA; Mathieson, S; Hancock, M; Verhagen, A; Nogueira, LAC; Young, A; Pate, JW; French, SD

Questionnaires assessing knowledge and beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions are potentially suitable for use, but further research is needed: a systematic review.

Corrêa, LA Mathieson, S Hancock, M Verhagen, A

Nogueira, LAC Young, A Pate, JW French, SD

Permalink

Publisher:: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: J Clin Epidemiol, 2024, 172, pp. 111398
Issue Date:: 2024-08

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (1 MB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Corrêa, LA
dc.contributor.author	Mathieson, S
dc.contributor.author	Hancock, M
dc.contributor.author	Verhagen, A https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-0128
dc.contributor.author	Nogueira, LAC
dc.contributor.author	Young, A
dc.contributor.author	Pate, JW
dc.contributor.author	French, SD
dc.date.accessioned	2024-09-20T05:03:10Z
dc.date.available	2024-05-21
dc.date.available	2024-09-20T05:03:10Z
dc.date.issued	2024-08
dc.identifier.citation	J Clin Epidemiol, 2024, 172, pp. 111398
dc.identifier.issn	0895-4356
dc.identifier.issn	1878-5921
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/180895
dc.description.abstract	OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the measurement properties of Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for knowledge and/or beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO - ID: CRD42022303111. Electronic databases, reference lists, forward citation tracking, and contact with experts were used to identify studies. Eligible studies were reports developing or assessing a measurement property of a PROM measuring musculoskeletal condition specific-knowledge and/or beliefs. We assessed the methodological quality and measurement properties of included studies. A modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence for each PROM. RESULTS: The literature search was performed from inception to 11th September 2023. Sixty records were included, reporting 290 individual studies, and provided information on 25 PROMs. Five PROMs presented sufficient structural validity, three presented sufficient cross-cultural validity, ten presented sufficient reliability, three presented sufficient criterion validity, six presented sufficient hypothesis-testing, and four presented sufficient responsiveness. No PROM presented sufficient evidence for content validity, internal consistency, and measurement error. Based on the available evidence, no PROM was classified as suitable for use according to the COSMIN recommendations. Twenty-four PROMs are potentially suitable for use, and one PROM is not recommended for use. CONCLUSION: No PROM designed to assess knowledge and/or beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions meets the COSMIN criteria of suitable for use. Most PROMs identified in this systematic review were considered as potentially suitable for use and need further high-quality research to assess their measurement properties.
dc.format	Print-Electronic
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.relation.ispartof	J Clin Epidemiol
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111398
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	01 Mathematical Sciences, 11 Medical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.classification	Epidemiology
dc.subject.classification	4202 Epidemiology
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Musculoskeletal Diseases
dc.subject.mesh	Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.mesh	Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Musculoskeletal Diseases
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.title	Questionnaires assessing knowledge and beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions are potentially suitable for use, but further research is needed: a systematic review.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	172
utslib.location.activity	United States
utslib.for	01 Mathematical Sciences
utslib.for	11 Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health/GSH.Physiotherapy
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
dc.rights.license	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.date.updated	2024-09-20T05:03:09Z
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	172

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the measurement properties of Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for knowledge and/or beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO - ID: CRD42022303111. Electronic databases, reference lists, forward citation tracking, and contact with experts were used to identify studies. Eligible studies were reports developing or assessing a measurement property of a PROM measuring musculoskeletal condition specific-knowledge and/or beliefs. We assessed the methodological quality and measurement properties of included studies. A modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence for each PROM. RESULTS: The literature search was performed from inception to 11th September 2023. Sixty records were included, reporting 290 individual studies, and provided information on 25 PROMs. Five PROMs presented sufficient structural validity, three presented sufficient cross-cultural validity, ten presented sufficient reliability, three presented sufficient criterion validity, six presented sufficient hypothesis-testing, and four presented sufficient responsiveness. No PROM presented sufficient evidence for content validity, internal consistency, and measurement error. Based on the available evidence, no PROM was classified as suitable for use according to the COSMIN recommendations. Twenty-four PROMs are potentially suitable for use, and one PROM is not recommended for use. CONCLUSION: No PROM designed to assess knowledge and/or beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions meets the COSMIN criteria of suitable for use. Most PROMs identified in this systematic review were considered as potentially suitable for use and need further high-quality research to assess their measurement properties.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/180895