The Parent PrU: A measure to assess personal utility of pediatric genomic results.
- Publisher:
- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Genet Med, 2024, 26, (1), pp. 100994-100994
- Issue Date:
- 2024
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author |
Turbitt, E https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-9702 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Kohler, JN | |
dc.contributor.author | Brothers, KB | |
dc.contributor.author | Outram, SM | |
dc.contributor.author | Rini, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Sahin-Hodoglugil, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Leo, MC | |
dc.contributor.author | Biesecker, BB | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-23T04:13:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-06 | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-23T04:13:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Genet Med, 2024, 26, (1), pp. 100994-100994 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1098-3600 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1530-0366 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/180917 | |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: We aimed to adapt and validate an existing patient-reported outcome measure, the personal-utility (PrU) scale, for use in the pediatric genomic context. METHODS: We adapted the adult version of the PrU and obtained feedback from 6 parents whose child had undergone sequencing. The resulting measure, the Parent PrU, was administered to parents of children in 4 pediatric cohorts of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium after they received their children's genomic results. We investigated the measure's structural validity and internal consistency. RESULTS: We conducted a principal-axis factor analysis with oblimin rotation on data from 755 participants to determine structural validity. These analyses yielded a 3-factor solution, accounting for 76% of the variance in the 16 items. We used Cronbach's α to assess the internal consistency of each factor: (1) child benefits (α = .95), (2) affective parent benefits (α = .90), and (3) parent control (α = .94). CONCLUSION: Our evidence suggests that the Parent PrU scale has potential as a measure for assessing parent-reported personal utility of their children's genomic results. Additional research is needed to further validate the Parent PrU scale, including by comparing its findings with utility assessments reported by clinicians and children themselves. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Genet Med | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100994 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 0604 Genetics, 1103 Clinical Sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | Genetics & Heredity | |
dc.subject.classification | 3105 Genetics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | |
dc.subject.mesh | Genomics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Parents | |
dc.subject.mesh | Outcome Assessment, Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | |
dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | |
dc.subject.mesh | Parents | |
dc.subject.mesh | Genomics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | |
dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Outcome Assessment, Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | |
dc.subject.mesh | Genomics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Parents | |
dc.subject.mesh | Outcome Assessment, Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | |
dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
dc.title | The Parent PrU: A measure to assess personal utility of pediatric genomic results. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 26 | |
utslib.location.activity | United States | |
utslib.for | 0604 Genetics | |
utslib.for | 1103 Clinical Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Graduate School of Health/GSH.Genetic Counselling | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
pubs.consider-herdc | false | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-09-23T04:13:54Z | |
pubs.issue | 1 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
pubs.volume | 26 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 1 |
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We aimed to adapt and validate an existing patient-reported outcome measure, the personal-utility (PrU) scale, for use in the pediatric genomic context. METHODS: We adapted the adult version of the PrU and obtained feedback from 6 parents whose child had undergone sequencing. The resulting measure, the Parent PrU, was administered to parents of children in 4 pediatric cohorts of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium after they received their children's genomic results. We investigated the measure's structural validity and internal consistency. RESULTS: We conducted a principal-axis factor analysis with oblimin rotation on data from 755 participants to determine structural validity. These analyses yielded a 3-factor solution, accounting for 76% of the variance in the 16 items. We used Cronbach's α to assess the internal consistency of each factor: (1) child benefits (α = .95), (2) affective parent benefits (α = .90), and (3) parent control (α = .94). CONCLUSION: Our evidence suggests that the Parent PrU scale has potential as a measure for assessing parent-reported personal utility of their children's genomic results. Additional research is needed to further validate the Parent PrU scale, including by comparing its findings with utility assessments reported by clinicians and children themselves.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph