Bringing Cyber Hate Under Control Through a Pro-active Legal Approach: An Australian Case Study
- Publisher:
- Springer
- Publication Type:
- Chapter
- Citation:
- Handbook on Cyber Hate, 2024, 13, pp. 261-274
- Issue Date:
- 2024-01-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
978-3-031-51248-3_13.pdf | Published version | 285.5 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
The new Australian legislation empowering the eSafety Commissioner has established a system with some good powers. So far, the eSafety Commissioner seems to have a good record of handling one-off, prominent cases, but not continuing, everyday harms suffered by vulnerable groups in particular. Overall, it appears that the problem is individuated and while the eSafety Commissioner is addressing large tech corporations and asking them to do better, they are not making enough use of their powers to seek penalties for the poor and inadequate actions on behalf of corporate actors. Law should create a positive legal duty for these corporations who make so much money from our online use to ensure a safe space for all uses. The corollary is product liability laws or workplace safety laws or consumer safety laws. The current regime in Australia focuses too much on individuals—both as perpetrators and victims—rather than seeing the bigger picture of how cyber hate is a collective harm. Tech companies have the technology, the capacity and the resources to manage and minimise this harm, and law should ensure that this happens.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: