History and its racial legacies: Quotas in South African rugby and cricket
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Sport in Society, 2011, 14 (6), pp. 754 - 777
- Issue Date:
- 2011-08-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2011002137OK.pdf | 195.03 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
South African identity has always been shaped by racial quotas; that is, divisions, assignments, allowances and allocations based on socially created ideas of race and difference. Both law and custom assigned a hierarchy which separated the rulers from the ruled, and allocated and rationed goods, services and enjoyments in all spheres of life, including sport. 'Superior' whites were layered above the Cape coloured people, followed by the Indian community and, lastly, the Africans, the black majority. This article looks briefly at the historical context of racial divisions and, with the downfall of apartheid, the rhetoric of an avowedly de-racialized 'new South Africa'. Given the chronic history of negative discrimination, it is understandable that affirmative action has become a major policy framework in the building of a post-apartheid society. But sport is a sobering example of how a domain can be 're-racialized' in this quest. How does the African National Congress justify the (re)introduction into sport of a proportional or numerical quota system based on racial categories? Is there a need for demographic representativeness in white-dominated sports like cricket and rugby, but seemingly not in black-dominated soccer? Is an arithmetic quota system not merely a logical extension of the reviled racial genres and divides of previous centuries?. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: