A method assessment framework

McBride, T; Henderson-Sellers, B

A method assessment framework

McBride, T

Henderson-Sellers, B

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2011, 351 AICT pp. 64 - 76
Issue Date:: 2011-04-14

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2010004954OK.pdf		810.86 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	McBride, T https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9038-7952	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Henderson-Sellers, B	en_US
dc.date.issued	2011-04-14	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2011, 351 AICT pp. 64 - 76	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9783642199967	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1868-4238	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19198
dc.description.abstract	Situational method engineering is used to create methods for use on projects. It is vital that such constructed methods be of good quality and relevant to the software development project in hand. Current capability assessment approaches cannot readily be applied to such SME-constructed methods since they do not differentiate between the three "phases" of method construction and enactment: method design, method enactment and method performance. Here, we clearly differentiate the kind of quality assessment activities that need to be performed in these three different situations. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-3-642-19997-4_7	en_US
dc.title	A method assessment framework	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	351 AICT	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
dc.location.activity	Paris	en_US
dc.location.activity	Univ Paris 1, Paris, FRANCE
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	351 AICT	en_US

Abstract:

Situational method engineering is used to create methods for use on projects. It is vital that such constructed methods be of good quality and relevant to the software development project in hand. Current capability assessment approaches cannot readily be applied to such SME-constructed methods since they do not differentiate between the three "phases" of method construction and enactment: method design, method enactment and method performance. Here, we clearly differentiate the kind of quality assessment activities that need to be performed in these three different situations. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19198