Supervising doctorates in creative writing: what is the lived experience?
- Publisher:
- ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- New Writing, 2025, 22, (4), pp. 543-564
- Issue Date:
- 2025-01-01
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Universities are increasingly focussed on the accountability, standardisation, professionalisation, completion rates and graduate outcomes of doctoral degrees. This is particularly pronounced in countries where doctoral completions count towards national research excellence evaluations or return a significant monetary value from government re-investment. As such, the supervision of doctorates is a growing field of research inquiry, including in creative writing where in some countries (e.g. Australia, New Zealand, UK) there are many doctoral candidates. While research to date explores supervisory practices from a variety of perspectives–including quantitative investigations of variables affecting completion time, supervisor management styles, and student and supervisor conceptions of supervision–the lived experience of supervising attracts less scholarly attention. Aspects such as supervisor training, candidate pastoral support, and supervisor workload and career development are real issues for supervisors and are arguably more pronounced in the creative doctorate, where thesis paradigms and research methodology are still not universally agreed upon. This article offers findings into what we call ‘the human dimension’ of doctoral supervision, drawing on a survey undertaken across Australia by supervisors of creative writing doctorates.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
