Advancing strong sustainability in transdisciplinary research: Opportunities, barriers, and strategies

Chakori, S; Grigg, NJ; Biely, K; Szetey, K; Dunlop, M; Gorddard, R; Hopkinson, S

Advancing strong sustainability in transdisciplinary research: Opportunities, barriers, and strategies

Chakori, S

Grigg, NJ Biely, K Szetey, K Dunlop, M Gorddard, R Hopkinson, S

Permalink

Publisher:: Wiley
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Earth Stewardship, 2025, 2, (4)
Issue Date:: 2025-08

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (575.68 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Chakori, S https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5857-4742
dc.contributor.author	Grigg, NJ
dc.contributor.author	Biely, K
dc.contributor.author	Szetey, K
dc.contributor.author	Dunlop, M
dc.contributor.author	Gorddard, R
dc.contributor.author	Hopkinson, S
dc.date.accessioned	2026-06-08T02:23:18Z
dc.date.available	2026-06-08T02:23:18Z
dc.date.issued	2025-08
dc.identifier.citation	Earth Stewardship, 2025, 2, (4)
dc.identifier.issn	2835-3617
dc.identifier.issn	2835-3617
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/195249
dc.description.abstract	Abstract Transdisciplinary approaches emphasize the need to engage with diverse actors to co‐produce knowledge and enable societal change to address interlinked socio‐ecological crises. This paper investigates how transdisciplinary partnerships can better work with strong sustainability perspectives, especially in contexts where actors hold differing worldviews. We explore the tension between transdisciplinary approaches and sustainability discourses. We begin by presenting the often contentious and divergent perspectives on strong and weak sustainability discourses, stressing that preferential engagement with weak sustainability approaches risks undermining strong sustainability transitions. Based on insights from reflexive practice on three research projects and the outcomes of a conference workshop, this article presents 12 strategies used to address common barriers to engaging with strong sustainability. These include researchers socializing new narratives (e.g., degrowth) and facilitating safe spaces to deliberate and explore societal mental models and paradigms. The findings underscore the political nature of knowledge production and stress the benefits of reflexivity at both individual and institutional levels. Reflecting on the politics of knowledge is not only an intellectual exercise, positionalities and interests of researchers and/or their organisations affect research agendas and resources. This research contributes to advancing sustainability transitions by highlighting strategies for questioning and challenging dominant economic and political systems within transdisciplinary partnerships, opening opportunities for deeper transitions toward more equitable and sustainable futures.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Wiley
dc.relation.ispartof	Earth Stewardship
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1002/eas2.70023
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title	Advancing strong sustainability in transdisciplinary research: Opportunities, barriers, and strategies
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)
pubs.organisational-group	University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)/Institute For Sustainable Futures
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
dc.rights.license	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.date.updated	2026-06-08T02:23:12Z
pubs.issue	4
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	2
utslib.citation.issue	4

Abstract:

Abstract Transdisciplinary approaches emphasize the need to engage with diverse actors to co‐produce knowledge and enable societal change to address interlinked socio‐ecological crises. This paper investigates how transdisciplinary partnerships can better work with strong sustainability perspectives, especially in contexts where actors hold differing worldviews. We explore the tension between transdisciplinary approaches and sustainability discourses. We begin by presenting the often contentious and divergent perspectives on strong and weak sustainability discourses, stressing that preferential engagement with weak sustainability approaches risks undermining strong sustainability transitions. Based on insights from reflexive practice on three research projects and the outcomes of a conference workshop, this article presents 12 strategies used to address common barriers to engaging with strong sustainability. These include researchers socializing new narratives (e.g., degrowth) and facilitating safe spaces to deliberate and explore societal mental models and paradigms. The findings underscore the political nature of knowledge production and stress the benefits of reflexivity at both individual and institutional levels. Reflecting on the politics of knowledge is not only an intellectual exercise, positionalities and interests of researchers and/or their organisations affect research agendas and resources. This research contributes to advancing sustainability transitions by highlighting strategies for questioning and challenging dominant economic and political systems within transdisciplinary partnerships, opening opportunities for deeper transitions toward more equitable and sustainable futures.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/195249