Regulation View 2009 Benchmark Report about Implementation of Regulations in Organisations

Hackman, K

Regulation View 2009 Benchmark Report about Implementation of Regulations in Organisations

Hackman, K

Permalink

Publication Type:: Technical Report
Citation:: Hackman, K. 2009. Regulation View 2009 Benchmark Report about Implementation of Regulations in Organisations. www.regulationview.com.au
Issue Date:: 2009-08

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download ReportAdobe PDF (738.22 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Hackman, K
dc.date.accessioned	2010-05-07T05:48:02Z
dc.date.accessioned	2012-12-15T02:52:32Z
dc.date.available	2010-05-07T05:48:02Z
dc.date.available	2012-12-15T02:52:32Z
dc.date.issued	2009-08
dc.identifier.citation	Hackman, K. 2009. Regulation View 2009 Benchmark Report about Implementation of Regulations in Organisations. www.regulationview.com.au	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19810
dc.description.abstract	This research, the first of its type in Australia, investigates how organisations implement new or amended regulations and what influences their approach. Of particular interest is what influences organisations to do more than the minimum to comply. This is an important question because doing more than the minimum may be necessary to achieve the intent of the regulations, especially with the trend to more principles based regulation using risk based assessments. The 2009 report focuses on results for two types of regulations in Australia: the core Financial and Insurance Services Industry regulations (FIS) and the cross industry Occupational Health & Safety regulations (OHS).The results showed that there were significant similarities between the FIS and OHS. Implementation of regulations was considered from the perspective of people internal and external to organisations. There was significant agreement between these two views.	en
dc.description.sponsorship	The 2009 survey was supported by many individuals, organisations and associations. The University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) and the Australasian Compliance Institute (ACI) were the primary partners and the survey was supported by the Safety Institute of Australia (SIA). Other associations that assisted include the Australian Institute of Project Management (AIPM) and the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA). Finally, this report would not have been possible without the many anonymous people who completed the survey. Thank you.	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.relation.replaces	http://hdl.handle.net/2100/1068
dc.title	Regulation View 2009 Benchmark Report about Implementation of Regulations in Organisations	en
dc.type	Technical report	en
utslib.copyright.status	open_access

Abstract:

This research, the first of its type in Australia, investigates how organisations implement new or amended regulations and what influences their approach. Of particular interest is what influences organisations to do more than the minimum to comply. This is an important question because doing more than the minimum may be necessary to achieve the intent of the regulations, especially with the trend to more principles based regulation using risk based assessments. The 2009 report focuses on results for two types of regulations in Australia: the core Financial and Insurance Services Industry regulations (FIS) and the cross industry Occupational Health & Safety regulations (OHS).The results showed that there were significant similarities between the FIS and OHS. Implementation of regulations was considered from the perspective of people internal and external to organisations. There was significant agreement between these two views.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19810