The Scopic Regime of the Digital:The New Instrumentality of Perspective

Perin, GJ

The Scopic Regime of the Digital:The New Instrumentality of Perspective

Perin, GJ

Permalink

Publisher:: SAHANZ & University of South Australia
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand (SAHANZ) Annual Conference, 2007, pp. 1 - 11
Issue Date:: 2007-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2007001164.pdf		2.65 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Perin, GJ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-4094	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Loo, S	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Bartsch, K	en_US
dc.date	2007-09-21	en_US
dc.date.issued	2007-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand (SAHANZ) Annual Conference, 2007, pp. 1 - 11	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-0-9802840-4-1	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/2079
dc.description.abstract	Panofsky promotes linear perspective as a modern scopic regime because of its capacity to maintain the visual dimensional integrity of the form it represents. Validation of this method lies implicitly around an argument of tracing existent form when in actuality perspective is architecturally deployed for its projective capacity. This schism between trace and projection is obvious given that the constructional logic of linear perspective is entirely dependent on the orthographic drawing. Put simply, without the plan, section and elevation there can be no perspective drawing.	en_US
dc.publisher	SAHANZ & University of South Australia	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand (SAHANZ) Annual Conference	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference	en_US
dc.title	The Scopic Regime of the Digital:The New Instrumentality of Perspective	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location	Adelaide, Australia	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Adelaide, Australia	en_US
utslib.for	1201 Architecture	en_US
utslib.for	1205 Urban and Regional Planning	en_US
dc.location.activity	Adelaide, Australia	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Architecture
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Adelaide, Australia	en_US
pubs.start-date	2007-09-21	en_US

Abstract:

Panofsky promotes linear perspective as a modern scopic regime because of its capacity to maintain the visual dimensional integrity of the form it represents. Validation of this method lies implicitly around an argument of tracing existent form when in actuality perspective is architecturally deployed for its projective capacity. This schism between trace and projection is obvious given that the constructional logic of linear perspective is entirely dependent on the orthographic drawing. Put simply, without the plan, section and elevation there can be no perspective drawing.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/2079